to the
> actual subclasses that are associated with that functionality (and if that
> is not a good idea, why do we have them?), and B) discard the request
> parameters if someone uses anything other than the expected two subclasses
> of SolrParams in the request.
&g
with that functionality (and if
> that
> > is not a good idea, why do we have them?), and B) discard the request
> > parameters if someone uses anything other than the expected two
> subclasses
> > of SolrParams in the request.
> >
> > Has this been considered before?
thing other than the expected two subclasses
> of SolrParams in the request.
>
> Has this been considered before?
>
> Archives search only brought up my previous irritations with SolrParams
> implementations...
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tkoj75z736x1nzotgh2xsn7wdnn
d before?
Archives search only brought up my previous irritations with SolrParams
implementations...
https://lists.apache.org/thread/tkoj75z736x1nzotgh2xsn7wdnnsoc8g
-Gus
--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
