[Bug 3751] New: content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 Summary: content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other

[Bug 3751] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.0.0 --- You are

[Bug 3751] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 17:09 --- Created an attachment (id=2318) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2318action=view) suggested patch this patch adds in optional whitespace

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|content-type header parsing |[review] content-type header

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 17:58 --- just to note, at least mutt and Outlook Express parse the malformed boundary out. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list

[Bug 3749] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2315 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3749] [review] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|message parser skips|[review] message parser

[Bug 3752] New: MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 Summary: MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.64 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 3752] MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3752] MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||3010 --- You are

[Bug 3754] New: sa-learn: successful return code though file not found

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3754 Summary: sa-learn: successful return code though file not found Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:18 --- Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:28 --- Subject: Re: -H should have long name Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421. Argh... I was just preparing a patch. :-) --- You

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 12:00 --- Sorry, I didn't even see that it was you who filed/forwarded the bug -- I just knew that there's already such a long name because I always thought the name

Re: [Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
Sorry, I didn't even see that it was you who filed/forwarded the bug -- I just knew that there's already such a long name because I always thought the name sucks :~) Not a big deal, its a trivial fix :-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature