https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #13 from Jeff Chan ---
I am agnostic about what the best solution is, but I'm certain that input
validation is a very good idea that is needed and will address a too common
problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #12 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
I can agree this ticket can stay open and leave the other resolved.
I believe we need an alert rule that triggers for ANY rbl respond outside of
127/8. Then if local admins don't like it SCOR
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #11 from Jeff Chan ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think the current SURBL rules only match on the last octet:
>
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_SC_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 2
>
> This could be handled by just
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #10 from Jeff Chan ---
Comment 7 of bug 6728 is arguably off topic for that bug. The issue in this
bug is different from the core purpose of the other bug which is to correctly
interpret a signal of being deliberately blocke
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #9 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> To me it makes more sense to educate ppl who have a problam than hide if
> from them.
> If they haven't figured out the issue on their own, they'll hardly figure
> out t
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #8 from AXB ---
To me it makes more sense to educate ppl who have a problam than hide if from
them.
If they haven't figured out the issue on their own, they'll hardly figure out
the meaning of a warning - if they ever see it.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #7 from Darxus ---
I think the current SURBL rules only match on the last octet:
25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_SC_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 2
This could be handled by just changing to rules to match the entire
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
John Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jhar...@impsec.org
--- Comment #6
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Not a duplicate. The issue raised is entirely different.
I think not. See 6728 comment 7. It has to do with validation outside of
127/8 which has been discussed befo
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
Jeff Chan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICA
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Chan ---
SURBL is not doing blocking the way the other lists are, therefore that issue
is not affecting users of SURBL data, and this issue is different from 6728.
The biggest problem is deliberate DNS corrupt
Yet another (yuk!) Facebook game.
If they send mail with that domain, it's not happening as a generic user
"freemailer". If they play bad, they'll feel it elsewhere.
Axb
On 06/08/2012 03:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I saw this and was responding:
Skim.com appears to redir now to facebook.
I saw this and was responding:
Skim.com appears to redir now to facebook. Is it used in any way to
send outbound mail/notices/etc. for facebook members or a similar
structure that still has no cost?
Do you think there is a risk or just ignore?
Regards,
KAM
Original Message ---
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6804
--- Comment #1 from AXB ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_freemail_domains.
> cf lists skim.com as a freemail provider. The domain has been transferred to
> a new owner about a yea
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6728
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||je...@surbl.org
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6804
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 6804
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Summary: skim.com is no longer a freemail domain
Severity: minor
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
Jeff Chan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||je...@surbl.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 6803
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Summary: Add input validation to responses from DNSBL queries
Severity: major
Classification: Unclassified
19 matches
Mail list logo
