Linda Walsh wrote:
I brought this up on this list before, and some
people don't realize that an invalid 'return address' should
be rejected.
...
Accepting bogus email with invalid return paths only helps
spammers and no ISP should accept such... i.e. it says if the
retuen path is not
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7092
Bug ID: 7092
Summary: Vulnerability for X509 Certificate Verification
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7092
--- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
Jerry,
I very much appreciate your effort to analyze the spamc client program,
to dig up this lack of verification issue, and to let us know about it!
Don't know how often such
