http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 20:18 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RegistrarBoundaries module |[review] RegistrarBoundaries
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 19:05 ---
I'd +1 if we had a mass-check result for this one.
style comment: as a clarity/readability thing, I always prefer to use:
@parts 3
rather than $#parts...
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 19:44 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RegistrarBoundaries module doesn't correctly extract
domains out of certain URIs
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:05:28PM -0700, [EMAIL
The changes will make the behavior more correct and faster.
Then there should at the very least be no worsening of the mass-check
results. I'm not going to +1 major behavioral changes to 3.0.1 tree
unless someone tests them on a small corpus. It's the *stable* tree.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:14 ---
doh. +1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RegistrarBoundaries module |[review] RegistrarBoundaries
