[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 22:14 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 10:37 --- the spamc part is nearly

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 05:29 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 03:26 --- As I consider this

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:48 --- Created an attachment (id=2849) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2849action=view) First throw of ListsReport for spamc part --- You

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:54 --- Learning either as spam for reporting or as ham for revoking is just how that code works. Okay, for me learning is always a learn to bayesian. So, I think we've

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:00 --- Created an attachment (id=2850) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2850action=view) Second throw forgot to implement exclusion! ---

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2849 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:13 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:54 --- Learning either as spam

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:34 --- Thanks Michael, now I know why you want the learning combined with reporting. I didn't ever use the spamassassin command. So it wasn't clear to me that a

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2850 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.1.0 --- Additional

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 12:28 --- There are a couple of issues with the tests, one spamc doesn't return anything in the failure case, fixed in an upcoming patch, Reporter.pm defaults to everything

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 13:38 --- Much better idea for the t/spamc_optC.t test, I'll just create a quick reporter plugin, then we'll turn everything off and just use that plugin to test the

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 08:28 --- (In reply to comment #2) Nico, how would you get around the FP problem? As I understand it, reporting spam to various lists/services should always be done

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 08:52 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc I would like to start the spamc-part. But before I want to discuss the usage. I think it would make

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 09:03 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc Also, the REPORT command for the spamd protocol is taken so we'll have to come up with something else.

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 10:37 --- Hello Michael, the spamc part is nearly complete! The protocol is: LISTSREPORT SPAMC/1.3 ListsReport-type: 0 User: testuser ListsReport-type: 0 defines report

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-02 00:01 --- Hello Bob, I think you've misunderstood my request. My aim is to introduce an reporting capability usable by spamc/spamd, so anybody who runs only spamc/spamd

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||triage --- Additional

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 13:04 --- Oh sorry, i meant not into learning part. Reporting should be a seperate feature, not combined with learning. It's time to go to bed :-) --- You are