Re: SPF Meta rule requirements / cosmetics

2011-12-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:33:59 +0100, Axb wrote: if SPF plugin is disabled --lint -D spits out Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_PASS' Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_HELO_

Re: SPF Meta rule requirements / cosmetics

2011-12-10 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Axb wrote: Could these rules be put in between an ifplugin ? Fixed. Apologies! -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF

Re: SPF Meta rule requirements / cosmetics

2011-12-10 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 12/10/2011 9:33 AM, Axb wrote: if SPF plugin is disabled --lint -D spits out Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_PASS' Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_HELO_PASS' Dec 1

SPF Meta rule requirements / cosmetics

2011-12-10 Thread Axb
if SPF plugin is disabled --lint -D spits out Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_PASS' Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: meta test __SPF_FULL_PASS has undefined dependency 'SPF_HELO_PASS' Dec 10 15:31:28.161 [19321] dbg: rules: