Committed many test fixes more. And sa-compile was broken for perl <5.14.
With those done, tests look ok for many perl 5.10 - 5.28 versions I tested.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:53:27PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> 3.4.3 rc2 is now available at http://talon2.pccc.com/~kmcgrail/devel/
>
>
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7657
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5700
John Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jhar...@impsec.org
--- Comment #2
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5700
--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to John Hardin from comment #2)
> Rather than hardcoding a low "informative" score, why not let it float based
> on ruleQA?
Feel free to describe how to achieve that, as I have no clue how to
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4703
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6055
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6026
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC|
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
While running sa-update, I noticed a number of lines about replace tag
compilation errors.
Attached is an output from 3.4.2 and an output from 3.4.3.
Henrik, any thoughts?
It looks like appending another paren at the end of the entire RE would
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:51:17PM +,
bugzilla-dae...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5700
>
> --- Comment #4 from John Hardin ---
> Ooo. I'm not *totally* sure that works for base rules. RuleQA might be able to
> override the score for
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5757
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7657
--- Comment #4 from Ondřej Caletka ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #2)
> Can't reproduce here. Even your "mangled" example attachment body is
> identical to your first attachment!?
Sorry, it seems that I uploaded the wrong
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmcgr...@apache.org
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5596
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
Yes do rc3 and let's keep on testing..
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:58:10AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> OK, I was finding sa-compile issues as well. I'm using stock perl with Centos
> 7
> to mimic out of the box experience for lot of users. That might explain the
> potential blocker I
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
While running sa-update, I noticed a number of lines about replace tag
compilation errors.
Attached is an output from 3.4.2 and an output from 3.4.3.
Doesn't happen on a trunk lint... ?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7681
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7657
Ondřej Caletka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5629|0 |1
is obsolete|
OK, I was finding sa-compile issues as well. I'm using stock perl with
Centos 7 to mimic out of the box experience for lot of users. That might
explain the potential blocker I literally just posted.
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5700
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5700
--- Comment #4 from John Hardin ---
Ooo. I'm not *totally* sure that works for base rules. RuleQA might be able to
override the score for a rule given in 50_scores, but I don't think there's any
way for ruleQA to entirely suppress
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5554
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6196
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Historically this was done periodically - it's not been done for a long time.
I've been working on the QA system - it's definitely feasible to get all of the
rules going past the QA eyes and a score assigned automatically.
I'd like to iron out a few of the kinks and bugs within QA before
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:42:17PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/13/2019 11:33 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> >> While running sa-update, I noticed a number of lines about replace tag
> >> compilation errors.
> >>
> >> Attached is an output
On 6/13/2019 11:33 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> While running sa-update, I noticed a number of lines about replace tag
>> compilation errors.
>>
>> Attached is an output from 3.4.2 and an output from 3.4.3.
>>
>> Henrik, any thoughts?
>
> It looks like
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:59:16PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> Just double checking since John mentioned the extra parens.
In this case.. too much parens.. qr_to_string was supposed to remove the
(?-xism:.
We should really implement the (apache infra provided?) CI service that
would
On 6/13/2019 1:13 PM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:59:16PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Just double checking since John mentioned the extra parens.
> In this case.. too much parens.. qr_to_string was supposed to remove the
> (?-xism:.
>
> We should really implement the
OK, will do. In the meantime, please keep banging away at these small
issues. It's great to see bugs closing.
We also had a vote for the PMC to go to R-T-C and at 00:00 UTC on 6/16,
we will go to RTC. That will be 8PM EDT on 6/15.
Regards,
KAM
On 6/13/2019 11:04 AM, Henrik K wrote:
> Yes do
On 6/13/2019 12:44 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>> Henrik, your thoughts on this with the sa-compile changes? The key
>> point I need is should it block 3.4.3 or did you already fix it? Or is
>> it just a rule issue?
> I thought it was already established that I fixed it and rc3 needs to
> rolled.
>
Just
32 matches
Mail list logo
