http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 20:07 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 20:06 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2306 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 20:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=2306)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2306&action=view)
suggested patch
basically the same as the one suggested
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 19:17 ---
I'm +1 on the suggested fix, fwiw. however I've scribbled on that code in my
svn so I can't upload a patch as a proper attachment. ;)
do we need a CLA for this?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 19:05 ---
Subject: Re: Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 06:27:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> er, theo, I think the waitpid() version
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 18:43 ---
Just as an FYI, we can see the changes in action in the following log extract;
the spamd parent detected just a single SIGCHLD but the waitpid call cleaned up
4 pr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 18:27 ---
er, theo, I think the waitpid() version is what shane's suggesting. current svn
has:
sub child_handler {
my ($sig) = @_;
$SIG{CHLD} = \&child_handler;# r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 18:16 ---
Subject: Re: Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 05:53:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We suspect the problem has to do with a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 17:53 ---
Hi Theo,
We suspect the problem has to do with a SIGCHLD being received whilst the spamd
process is already in the wait state cleaning up another SIGCHLD signal;
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 16:10 ---
hrm. it seems like for some reason either 1) the OS isn't sending a SIGCHLD
when the child exits, so the parent doesn't know to wait for it and spawn a new
child,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 15:53 ---
Hi Justin,
The process list as of this morning:
520 9297 1 0 Sep02 ?00:00:01 /net/sa/bin/spamd -u
spamassassin -x -d --max-children 7
520
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 12:42 ---
have you seen more than 1 defunct process?
on some platforms spamd will occasionally have 1 (and only 1) defunct process
listed, but that has virtually no effect
16 matches
Mail list logo
