> Sorry, I didn't even see that it was you who filed/forwarded the bug -- I
> just
> knew that there's already such a long name because I always thought the name
> sucks :~)
Not a big deal, its a trivial fix :-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 12:00 ---
Sorry, I didn't even see that it was you who filed/forwarded the bug -- I just
knew that there's already such a long name because I always thought the name
sucks
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:28 ---
Subject: Re: -H should have long name
> Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421.
Argh... I was just preparing a patch. :-)
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:23 ---
Subject: Re: -H should have long name
> >From 3.0's man page:
> | -H directory, --helper-home-dir=directory
My mistake. The problem then is that it's not list
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:18 ---
Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are wat
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
Target Milestone|Future