Re: PSA: Java 8 unidoc build

2017-02-06 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
(One more.. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15999 this describes some more cases that might easily be mistaken) On 7 Feb 2017 9:21 a.m., "Hyukjin Kwon" wrote: > Oh, Joseph, thanks. It is nice to inform this in dev mailing list. > > Let me please leave another PR to

Re: PSA: Java 8 unidoc build

2017-02-06 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Oh, Joseph, thanks. It is nice to inform this in dev mailing list. Let me please leave another PR to refer, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013 and the JIRA you kindly opened, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18692 On 7 Feb 2017 9:13 a.m., "Joseph Bradley"

PSA: Java 8 unidoc build

2017-02-06 Thread Joseph Bradley
Public service announcement: Our doc build has worked with Java 8 for brief time periods, but new changes keep breaking the Java 8 unidoc build. Please be aware of this, and try to test doc changes with Java 8! In general, it is stricter than Java 7 for docs. A shout out to @HyukjinKwon and

[SPARK-19405] Looking for committer to review kinesis-asl PR

2017-02-06 Thread Budde, Adam
Hey all, Apologies for spamming this to the entire dev list, but I haven’t been able to find reviewers for a PR I have open to add a new authorization options to KinesisReciever/KinesisUtils: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744 The PR merges cleanly and passes all tests. @srowen

[STREAMING] Looking for committer to review kinesis-asl PR

2017-02-06 Thread Adam Budde
Hey all, Apologies for spamming the entire dev list, but I'm having some difficulty finding reviewers for a PR I have open to add additional authorization options to KinesisUtils/KinesisReceiver: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744 The change passes all tests and merges cleanly. @srowen

[STREAMING] Looking for committer to review kinesis-asl PR

2017-02-06 Thread Adam Budde
Hello all, Apologies for spamming the entire dev list, but I'm having some difficulty finding reviewers for a PR I have open to add additional authorization options to KinesisUtils/KinesisReceiver: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744 The change passes all tests and merges cleanly.

Re: [SQL]SQLParser fails to resolve nested CASE WHEN statement with parentheses in Spark 2.x

2017-02-06 Thread Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier
Hi Stan, I have opened https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821 to fix this. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:41 PM, StanZhai wrote: > Hi all, > > SQLParser fails to resolve nested CASE WHEN statement like this: > > select case when > (1) + > case when 1>0 then 1 else 0 end =

[SQL]SQLParser fails to resolve nested CASE WHEN statement with parentheses in Spark 2.x

2017-02-06 Thread StanZhai
Hi all, SQLParser fails to resolve nested CASE WHEN statement like this: select case when (1) + case when 1>0 then 1 else 0 end = 2 then 1 else 0 end from tb Exception Exception in thread "main" org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:

Re: [SQL]A confusing NullPointerException when creating table using Spark2.1.0

2017-02-06 Thread StanZhai
This issue has been fixed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820 . -- View this message in context:

Re: FileNotFoundException, while file is actually available

2017-02-06 Thread censj
If you deploy yarn model,you can used yarn logs -applicationId youApplicationId get yarn logs. You can get logs in details。 Then Looking error info, === Name: cen sujun Mobile: 13067874572 Mail: ce...@lotuseed.com > 在 2017年2月6日,05:33,Evgenii Morozov