Of course, the hash value can just be negative. I thought that it would be
after computation without overflow.
When I checked another implementation, it performs computations with int.
https://github.com/ALShum/MinHashLSH/blob/master/LSH.java#L89
By copy to Xjiayuan, did you compare the hash
I think it probably still does its.job; the hash value can just be
negative. It is likely to be very slightly biased though. Because the
intent doesn't seem to be to allow the overflow it's worth changing to use
longs for the calculation.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018, 8:36 PM jiayuanm wrote:
> Hi
