+1 (non-binding)
I run tests on a EC2 m4.2xlarge instance;
[ec2-user]$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_171"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b10, mixed mode)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:29 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On
+1
From: Bruce Robbins
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:02 PM
To: Ryan Blue
Cc: Spark Dev List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue
mailto:b...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
>F
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposa
+1 (non-binding).
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:32 AM Henry Robinson
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
>> remove the existing plans.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17,
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:38 AM Denny Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 23:04 John Zhuge wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:04 PM Saisai Shao
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will put my +1 on this RC.
>>>
>>> For the test failure fix, I will
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin wrote:
> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
> remove the existing plans.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 23:04 John Zhuge wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:04 PM Saisai Shao
> wrote:
>
>> I will put my +1 on this RC.
>>
>> For the test failure fix, I will include it if there's another RC.
>>
>> Sean Owen 于2018年7月16日周一 下午10:47写道:
>>
> O
+1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
remove the existing plans.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
> have consensus around the plan to standardize logi
+1 (non-binding)
On 18 July 2018 at 17:32, Xiao Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation
> sketch is not part of this vote.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xiao
>
> 2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer :
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18,
+1 (binding)
Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation
sketch is not part of this vote.
Cheers,
Xiao
2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 J
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro,
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wench
Hi
You can access your java packages using following in pySpark
obj = sc._jvm.yourPackage.className()
Kind Regards
Harsh Takkar
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:00 AM Mohit Jaggi wrote:
> Thanks 0xF0F0F0 and Ashutosh for the pointers.
>
> Holden,
> I am trying to look into sparklingml...what am I l
12 matches
Mail list logo