Re: [VOTE][RESULT] SPIP: Spark Connect

2022-06-16 Thread Martin Grund
Thanks everyone for your votes and thanks Herman for being the shepherd. On Fri 17. Jun 2022 at 02:23 Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Awesome, I am excited to see this in Apache Spark. > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 08:37, Herman van Hovell > wrote: > >> The vote passes with 17 +1s (10 binding +1s). >> +1:

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] SPIP: Spark Connect

2022-06-16 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Awesome, I am excited to see this in Apache Spark. On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 08:37, Herman van Hovell wrote: > The vote passes with 17 +1s (10 binding +1s). > +1: > Herman van Hovell* > Matei Zaharia* > Yuming Wang > Hyukjin Kwon* > Chao Sun > L.C. Hsieh* > Huaxin Gao > Ruifeng Zheng > Wenchen

[VOTE][RESULT] SPIP: Spark Connect

2022-06-16 Thread Herman van Hovell
The vote passes with 17 +1s (10 binding +1s). +1: Herman van Hovell* Matei Zaharia* Yuming Wang Hyukjin Kwon* Chao Sun L.C. Hsieh* Huaxin Gao Ruifeng Zheng Wenchen Fan* Believer Xiao Li* Reynold Xin* Dongjoon Hyun* Gangliang Wang Yikun Jiang Tom Graves * Holden Karau * 0: None (Tom has voiced

Re: [VOTE][SPIP] Spark Connect

2022-06-16 Thread Holden Karau
+1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:17 AM Thomas Graves wrote: > +1 for the concept. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but at a high level this is proposing adding > a new user API (which is language agnostic) and the proposal is to > start with something like the Logical Plan, with the addition of being >

Re: [VOTE][SPIP] Spark Connect

2022-06-16 Thread Thomas Graves
+1 for the concept. Correct me if I'm wrong, but at a high level this is proposing adding a new user API (which is language agnostic) and the proposal is to start with something like the Logical Plan, with the addition of being able to remotely call this API. +0 on architecture/design as it's not