[VOTE][RESULT] SPIP: Stored Procedures API for Catalogs

2024-05-15 Thread L. C. Hsieh
The vote passes with 13+1s (8 binding +1s) and 1+0. (* = binding) +1: Chao Sun (*) Liang-Chi Hsieh (*) Huaxin Gao (*) Bo Yang Dongjoon Hyun (*) Kent Yao Wenchen Fan (*) Ryan Blue Anton Okolnychyi Zhou Jiang Gengliang Wang (*) Xiao Li (*) Hyukjin Kwon (*) +0: None Mich Talebzadeh -1: None

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Stored Procedures API for Catalogs

2024-05-15 Thread L. C. Hsieh
Hi all, Thanks all for participating and your support! The vote has been passed. I'll send out the result in a separate thread. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:44 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 16:39, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:19 AM Zhou

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Stored Procedures API for Catalogs

2024-05-15 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
+1 On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 16:39, Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:19 AM Zhou Jiang wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 2:10 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Stored Procedures API for Catalogs. >>> >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] clarify the definition of behavior changes

2024-05-15 Thread Wenchen Fan
Thanks all for the feedback here! Let me put up a new version, which clarifies the definition of "users": Behavior changes mean user-visible functional changes in a new release via public APIs. The "user" here is not only the user who writes queries and/or develops Spark plugins, but also the

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 4.0.0-preview1 (RC1)

2024-05-15 Thread Wenchen Fan
RC1 failed because of this issue. I'll cut RC2 after we downgrade Jetty to 9.x. On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:37 PM Cheng Pan wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > A small question, the tag is orphan but I suppose it should belong to the > master branch. > > Seems YARN integration is broken due to javax =>