It sounds like with the slight wording change we’re in agreement so I’ll
bounce this by an editor friend to fix my grammar/spelling before I put it
up for a vote.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 9:23 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> +1 thanks Holden.
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, 22:34 Tom Graves,
> wrote:
>
>> +1
+1 thanks Holden.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, 22:34 Tom Graves, wrote:
> +1
>
> Tom
>
> On Tuesday, July 21, 2020, 03:35:18 PM CDT, Holden Karau <
> hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Spark Developers,
>
> There has been a rather active discussion regarding the specific vetoes
> that occured during
+1
Tom
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020, 03:35:18 PM CDT, Holden Karau
wrote:
Hi Spark Developers,
There has been a rather active discussion regarding the specific vetoes that
occured during Spark 3. From that I believe we are now mostly in agreement that
it would be best to clarify our rule
Thanks Holden, this version looks good to me.
+1
Regards,
Mridul
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:56 PM Imran Rashid wrote:
> Sure, that sounds good to me. +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:50 PM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:39 AM Imran Rashid < iras...@apache.org >
>> wr
Sure, that sounds good to me. +1
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:50 PM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:39 AM Imran Rashid < iras...@apache.org > wrote:
>
>> Hi Holden,
>>
>> thanks for leading this discussion, I'm in favor in general. I have one
>> specific question -- these two
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:39 AM Imran Rashid < iras...@apache.org > wrote:
> Hi Holden,
>
> thanks for leading this discussion, I'm in favor in general. I have one
> specific question -- these two sections seem to contradict each other
> slightly:
>
> > If there is a -1 from a non-committer, mult
Hi Holden,
thanks for leading this discussion, I'm in favor in general. I have one
specific question -- these two sections seem to contradict each other
slightly:
> If there is a -1 from a non-committer, multiple committers or the PMC
should be consulted before moving forward.
>
>If the original
Hi Spark Developers,
There has been a rather active discussion regarding the specific vetoes
that occured during Spark 3. From that I believe we are now mostly in
agreement that it would be best to clarify our rules around code vetoes &
merging in general. Personally I believe this change is impor
