Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-22 Thread Jules Damji
+ 1 (non-binding) Excuse the thumb typos On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 1:56 AM, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > The email will be sent as normal just like the regular release vote emails > we have sent in the past. I just wanted to make sure if we're fine with > automatiging it. > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 7:3

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-20 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
The email will be sent as normal just like the regular release vote emails we have sent in the past. I just wanted to make sure if we're fine with automatiging it. On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 7:38 PM Steve Loughran wrote: > email private@spark and let whoever is releasing forward it? > > On Thu, 5 J

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-19 Thread Steve Loughran
email private@spark and let whoever is releasing forward it? On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 00:53, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Hi all, > > As some of you may know, I’ve been working on automating the Spark release > process (release.yml > ). The >

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
The PR is ready for a look 👍 On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 17:41, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > I am working on it at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51122. > Some emails might be sent for RC 3.5.7 for testing purposes. Please ignore > them :-). I will reply to individual email as well to avoid confusion.

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-08 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
I am working on it at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51122. Some emails might be sent for RC 3.5.7 for testing purposes. Please ignore them :-). I will reply to individual email as well to avoid confusion. On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 20:07, Yang Jie wrote: > Option 1 +1, thank you, Hyukjin, for

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Thanks for the confirmation. That sounds great as long as the ASF account information is required per run and never be stored somewhere after the run. 2025년 6월 6일 (금) 오전 11:39, Hyukjin Kwon 님이 작성: > When you run the GitHub Actions to release, it requires you to specify an > ASF account and passwo

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Yang Jie
Option 1 +1, thank you, Hyukjin, for the efforts you've put into this. On 2025/06/06 02:59:32 Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Thanks for the confirmation. That sounds great as long as the ASF account > information is required per run and never be stored somewhere after the run. > > 2025년 6월 6일 (금) 오전 11:39

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
When you run the GitHub Actions to release, it requires you to specify an ASF account and password in GitHub Secrets. So I plan to use that to send an email. I will probably add a note that the email was auto generated .. On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 11:37, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > One question: is it pos

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Jungtaek Lim
One question: is it possible for the automation to send the mail on behalf of release manager? Or will we simply send the mail as specific mail account (mostly dedicated one for automated)? Maybe latter doesn’t even matter, but it might be less clear about who is driving the release, from automate

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Wenchen Fan
+1 for email automation! On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 8:22 AM Yuanjian Li wrote: > +1 for option 1. > > Seems the only downside of option 1 is that some RC numbers may be > non-sequential. > > Dongjoon Hyun 于2025年6月5日周四 07:57写道: > >> +1 for the proposal, Hyukjin. Thank you for the whole and seamless

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Yuanjian Li
+1 for option 1. Seems the only downside of option 1 is that some RC numbers may be non-sequential. Dongjoon Hyun 于2025年6月5日周四 07:57写道: > +1 for the proposal, Hyukjin. Thank you for the whole and seamless > migration toward this direction. > > Please make it sure that we explicitly show the hum

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-05 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
+1 for the proposal, Hyukjin. Thank you for the whole and seamless migration toward this direction. Please make it sure that we explicitly show the human release manager name and email address (instead of bot sender) in the generated email. That's the only concern I have. Thanks, Dongjoon. On

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-04 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
We can always invalidate the vote with -1 in case it is found to be sent incorrectly ... As long as the automation does not end up generating a tonne of mails, that is, it should be fairly manageable :) I am in favor of automating it with option 1. Thanks for driving this Hyukjin ! Regards, Mri

[DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-04 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Hi all, As some of you may know, I’ve been working on automating the Spark release process (release.yml ). The basic steps are done, and I’m now looking into automating some of the remaining manual tasks. One such task is sending the