Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36947949
I've created SPARK-1201
(https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1201) to cover optimizations
in cases other than DISK_ONLY.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36947762
Thanks @kellrott for this patch - sorry it took us a long time to review
it. I'm going to merge this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user kellrott commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36931153
I think I've covered all the formatting requests. Any other issues?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10245880
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -71,10 +71,21 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) exten
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36598072
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36598073
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12985/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36595760
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36595762
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10243269
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -71,10 +71,21 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) extends L
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36582785
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36582786
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12975/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36582197
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36582195
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10238895
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -23,9 +23,27 @@ import java.nio.ByteBuffer
import org.apache.spark
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10238901
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -23,9 +23,27 @@ import java.nio.ByteBuffer
import org.apache.spark
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10238870
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -23,9 +23,27 @@ import java.nio.ByteBuffer
import org.apache.spark
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10238815
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -71,10 +71,21 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) exten
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36580259
Alright, sounds good. Looking forward to it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user kellrott commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36483912
Thank you for the notes. I'll start working on fixing things.
I'd like to keep this patch 'simple', and limit the scope to DISK_ONLY, and
get it accepted before thinki
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201307
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -59,24 +59,45 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
maxMemory:
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201291
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala ---
@@ -52,11 +52,21 @@ private class DiskStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
diskManager: D
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201264
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -549,34 +555,43 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
var marke
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201268
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -549,34 +555,43 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
var marke
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36483263
Hey Kyle, thanks for bringing this to the new repo. I looked through it and
made a few comments. Another concern though is that it would be good to make
this work for MEMORY
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201195
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -71,10 +71,21 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) extends L
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201182
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -534,8 +539,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// If we're s
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201181
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -23,9 +23,27 @@ import java.nio.ByteBuffer
import org.apache.spark.Spa
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201177
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -71,10 +71,21 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) extends L
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201097
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/FlatmapIteratorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201080
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/FlatmapIteratorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#discussion_r10201076
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/FlatmapIteratorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36410331
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36410332
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12935/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36408974
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36408973
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50#issuecomment-36408986
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user kellrott opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50
Patch for SPARK-942
This is a port of a pull request original targeted at incubator-spark:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/180
Essentially if a user returns a generative itera
38 matches
Mail list logo
