Cancelled in favor of rc9.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to the issue discovered by Michael, this vote is cancelled in favor of
rc9.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Michael Armbrust
mich...@databricks.com wrote:
-1
We found a regression
Due to the issue discovered by Michael, this vote is cancelled in favor of rc9.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Michael Armbrust
mich...@databricks.com wrote:
-1
We found a regression in the way configuration is passed to executors.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1864
[Due to ASF e-mail outage, I'm not if anyone will actually receive this.]
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 1.0.0!
This has only minor changes on top of rc7.
The tag to be voted on is v1.0.0-rc8 (commit 80eea0f):
+1
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
[Due to ASF e-mail outage, I'm not if anyone will actually receive this.]
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
1.0.0!
This has only minor changes on top of rc7.
The tag to be
-1
We found a regression in the way configuration is passed to executors.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1864
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/808
Michael
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Hamstra m...@clearstorydata.comwrote:
+1
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:16 AM,
