I've already cut a new RC so I'd rather save SPARK-29536 but I'll include
mention of that in the vote e-mail.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 4:09 PM Sean Owen wrote:
> Probably, though given the late stage of this release cycle, I'd say that
> should go into 2.4.7.
> I think we are good to for a
Probably, though given the late stage of this release cycle, I'd say that
should go into 2.4.7.
I think we are good to for a probably fine 2.4.6 RC4 ? the indylambda
change was merged a while ago.
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 8:52 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any chance that
I was wondering if there is any chance that "SPARK-29536 PySpark does not work
with Python 3.8.0" could get eventually backported for a future RC. Seems
important enough considering that python 3.8 is now the default version for
people working on the latest Ubuntu LTS. I understand however that
That seems like an important concern. I'm going to go ahead and vote -1 on
this RC and I'll roll a new RC once the IndyLambda support is backported
into the 2.4 branch.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:58 PM DB Tsai wrote:
> I am changing my vote from +1 to +0.
>
> Since Spark 3.0 is Scala 2.12 only,
I am changing my vote from +1 to +0.
Since Spark 3.0 is Scala 2.12 only, having a transitional 2.4.x
release with great support of Scala 2.12 is very important. I would
like to have [SPARK-31399][CORE] Support indylambda Scala closure in
ClosureCleaner backported. Without it, it might break
Another two candidates for backporting that have come up since this RC are
SPARK-31692 & SPARK-31399. What are folks thoughts, should we roll an RC4?
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:13 PM Sean Owen wrote:
> Ah OK, I assumed from the timing that this was cut to include that commit.
> I should have
Ah OK, I assumed from the timing that this was cut to include that commit.
I should have looked.
Yes, it is not strictly a regression so does not have to block the release
and this can pass. We can release 2.4.7 in a few months, too.
How important is the fix? If it's pretty important, it may still
That is correct. I asked on the PR if that was ok with folks before I moved
forward with the RC and was told that it was ok. I believe that particular
bug is not a regression and is a long standing issue so we wouldn’t
normally block the release on it.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:40 AM Xiao Li
This RC does not include the correctness bug fix
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a4885f3654899bcb852183af70cc0a82e7dd81d0
which
is just after RC3 cut.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tom Graves
wrote:
> +1.
>
> Tom
>
> On Monday, May 18, 2020, 08:05:24 AM CDT, Wenchen Fan
> wrote:
>
>
>
+1.
Tom
On Monday, May 18, 2020, 08:05:24 AM CDT, Wenchen Fan
wrote:
+1, no known blockers.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:49 AM DB Tsai wrote:
+1 as well. Thanks.
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:39 AM Sean Owen wrote:
+1 , same response as to the last RC.
This looks like it includes the
+1, no known blockers.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:49 AM DB Tsai wrote:
> +1 as well. Thanks.
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:39 AM Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> +1 , same response as to the last RC.
>> This looks like it includes the fix discussed last time, as well as a
>> few more small good fixes.
>>
+1 as well. Thanks.
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:39 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> +1 , same response as to the last RC.
> This looks like it includes the fix discussed last time, as well as a
> few more small good fixes.
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:08 AM Holden Karau
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote on
+1 , same response as to the last RC.
This looks like it includes the fix discussed last time, as well as a
few more small good fixes.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:08 AM Holden Karau wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.4.6.
>
> The vote is open
+1,
Looks good. Thank you for putting this together.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:38 AM Holden Karau wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.4.6.
>
> The vote is open until May 22nd at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.4
.6.
The vote is open until May 22nd at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.4.6
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because
15 matches
Mail list logo
