Yup, I’ve run into some weirdness with docs again I want to verify before I
send the vote email though.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:06 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Shall we use the release scripts of branch 3.1 to release 3.1?
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:57 AM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>> Good catch
Shall we use the release scripts of branch 3.1 to release 3.1?
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:57 AM Holden Karau wrote:
> Good catch Dongjoon :)
>
> This release candidate fails, but feel free to keep testing for any other
> potential blockers.
>
> I’ll roll RC4 next week with the older release
Good catch Dongjoon :)
This release candidate fails, but feel free to keep testing for any other
potential blockers.
I’ll roll RC4 next week with the older release scripts (but the more modern
image since the legacy image didn’t have a good time with the R doc
packaging).
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at
Unfortunately, -1 for 3.1.3 RC3 due to the packaging issue.
It seems that the master branch release script didn't work properly for
Hadoop 2 binary distribution, Holden.
$ curl -s
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.1.3-rc3-bin/spark-3.1.3-bin-hadoop2.tgz
| tar tz | grep
Hi,
Minor nit: the tag mentioned under [1] looks like a typo - I used
"v3.1.3-rc3" for my vote (3.2.1 is mentioned in a couple of places, treat
them as 3.1.3 instead)
+1
Signatures, digests, etc check out fine.
Checked out tag and build/tested with -Pyarn -Pmesos -Pkubernetes
Regards,
Mridul
Thanks Tom !
I missed [1] (or probably forgot) the 3.1 part of the discussion given it
centered around 3.2 ...
Regards,
Mridul
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@spark.apache.org/msg28484.html
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:55 AM Thomas Graves wrote:
> It was discussed doing all the maintenance
It was discussed doing all the maintenance lines back at beginning of
December (Dec 6) when we were talking about release 3.2.1.
Tom
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:07 AM Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
> Hi Holden,
>
> Not that I am against releasing 3.1.3 (given the fixes that have already
> gone
+1 from me, same result as the last release on my end.
I think releasing 3.1.3 is fine, it's 7 months since 3.1.2.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:12 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.1.3.
>
> The vote is open until Feb. 4th at 5 PM
Hi Holden,
Not that I am against releasing 3.1.3 (given the fixes that have already
gone in), but did we discuss releasing it ? I might have missed the thread
...
Regards,
Mridul
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:12 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
3.1.3.
The vote is open until Feb. 4th at 5 PM PST (1 AM UTC + 1 day) and passes
if a majority
+1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 + 1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.1.3
[ ] -1 Do not release
10 matches
Mail list logo
