3945> but wanted to
>>> double check here to make sure I didn't miss something fundamental.
>>>
>>> Correlated subqueries are tracked at a high level in SPARK-18455
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18455>, but it's not clear
>>> to me whether they are "design-appropriate" for the DataFrame API.
>>>
>>> Are correlated subqueries a thing we can expect to have in the DataFrame
>>> API?
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Software Engineer
>> Netflix
>>
>
>
t; check here to make sure I didn't miss something fundamental.
>>
>> Correlated subqueries are tracked at a high level in SPARK-18455
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18455>, but it's not clear
>> to me whether they are "design-appropriate"
ache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18455>, but it's not clear
> to me whether they are "design-appropriate" for the DataFrame API.
>
> Are correlated subqueries a thing we can expect to have in the DataFrame
> API?
>
> Nick
>
>
--
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Netflix
t;, but it's not clear to
me whether they are "design-appropriate" for the DataFrame API.
Are correlated subqueries a thing we can expect to have in the DataFrame
API?
Nick
