]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 4:44 PM
To: Nicholas Chammas
Cc: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
02, 2014 4:44 PM
To: Nicholas Chammas
Cc: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
On a related note, the current AMI
: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
On a related note, the current AMI for hvm systems (e.g. m3.*, r3.*)
has
a bad
: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
On a related note, the current AMI for hvm systems (e.g. m3.*,
r3.*)
has
a bad package for httpd, whcih
Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
On a related note, the current AMI for hvm systems (e.g. m3.*, r3.*) has
a bad package for httpd, whcih causes
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 4:44 PM
To: Nicholas Chammas
Cc: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http://www.packer.io/intro/getting-started/build-image.html
On a related note, the current AMI for hvm systems (e.g. m3.*, r3.*) has
a bad package
Nate
-Original Message-
From: David Rowe [mailto:davidr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 4:44 PM
To: Nicholas Chammas
Cc: dev; Shivaram Venkataraman
Subject: Re: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
I think this is exactly what packer is for. See e.g.
http
It should be possible to improve cluster launch time if we are careful
about what commands we run during setup. One way to do this would be to
walk down the list of things we do for cluster initialization and see if
there is anything we can do make things faster. Unfortunately this might be
pretty
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Nate D'Amico n...@reactor8.com wrote:
Starting to work through some automation/config stuff for spark stack on
EC2 with a project, will be focusing the work through the apache bigtop
effort to start, can then share with spark community directly as things
Hi devs!
Right now it takes a non-trivial amount of time to launch EC2 clusters.
Part of this time is spent starting the EC2 instances, which is out of our
control. Another part of this time is spent installing stuff on and
configuring the instances. This, we can control.
I’d like to explore
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Chammas [mailto:nicholas.cham...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:06 PM
To: dev
Subject: EC2 clusters ready in launch time + 30 seconds
Hi devs!
Right now it takes a non-trivial amount of time to launch EC2 clusters.
Part of this time is spent
12 matches
Mail list logo
