gt; with all those critical bug fixes.
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Sharan
>
>
>
> From: Saisai Shao [mailto:sai.sai.s...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2018 08:30
> To: 441586683 <441586...@qq.com>
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
>
>
586...@qq.com>
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
Hi,
PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other
things. Please wait for a bit while.
Thanks
Saisai
zzc <441586...@qq.com<mailto:441586...@qq.com>> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道:
Hi Saisai:
Hi,
PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other
things. Please wait for a bit while.
Thanks
Saisai
zzc <441586...@qq.com> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道:
> Hi Saisai:
> Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
Hi Saisai:
Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2?
--
Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Hi
Any new progress ? will start RC6 soon ?
Regards
Liang
Saisai Shao wrote
> There's still another one SPARK-25114.
>
> I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped.
>
> Thanks
> Saisai
>
>
>
> Wenchen Fan
> cloud0fan@
> 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道:
>
>> SPARK-25051 is
There's still another one SPARK-25114.
I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped.
Thanks
Saisai
Wenchen Fan 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道:
> SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC?
>
> SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport.
>
> On Wed, Aug 15,
SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC?
SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> (We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance
> release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big
(We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance
release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have on
2.3.x in general)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga wrote:
> -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to
> be
>
-1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to be
back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain
--
Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
-
To unsubscribe e-mail:
-1, due to SPARK-25051. It is a regression and it is a correctness bug. In
2.3.0/2.3.1 an Analysis exception was thrown, 2.2.* works fine.
I cannot reproduce the issue on current master, but I was able using the
prepared 2.3.2 release.
Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle ore 10:04 Saisai Shao
ha
10 matches
Mail list logo