Would it make sense to have Jenkins *not* trigger tests when the only files
that have changed are .md files (example
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2367)? Those don’t even need RAT
checks, right?
I can make this change if it makes sense.
Nick
We could still have Jenkins post a message to the effect of “this patch
only modifies .md files; no tests will be run”.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Nicholas Chammas
nicholas.cham...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it make sense to have Jenkins *not* trigger tests when the only
files that have
I like that idea, but the load on Jenkins isn't very high. The more
complexity we add to the test script, the easier it is to screw it up (at
some point we would need to add unit tests for the build scripts).
Maybe we can just add the message part, so it becomes clear that a pull
request does not
