Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.5 (RC1)

2020-01-15 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Once we decided to cancel the RC1, what about including SPARK-29450 ( https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27209) into RC2? SPARK-29450 was merged into master, and Xiao figured out it fixed a regression, long lasting one (broken at 2.3.0). The link refers the PR for 2.4 branch. Thanks, Jungtaek

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.5 (RC1)

2020-01-15 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Sure. Wenchen and Hyukjin. I observed all of the above reported issues and have been waiting to collect more information before cancelling RC1 vote. The other stuff I've observed is that Marcelo and Sean also requested reverting the existing commit. - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24732

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.5 (RC1)

2020-01-15 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
If we go for RC2, we should include both: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27210 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27184 just for the sake of being complete and making the maintenance simple. 2020년 1월 16일 (목) 오후 12:38, Wenchen Fan 님이 작성: > Recently we merged several fixes to 2.4: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.5 (RC1)

2020-01-15 Thread Wenchen Fan
Recently we merged several fixes to 2.4: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30325 a driver hang issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30246 a memory leak issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29708 a correctness issue(for a rarely used feature, so not merged

Re: More publicly documenting the options under spark.sql.*

2020-01-15 Thread Nicholas Chammas
So do we want to repurpose SPARK-30510 as an SQL config refactor? Alternatively, what’s the smallest step forward I can take to publicly document partitionOverwriteMode (which was my impetus for looking into this in the first place)? 2020년 1월 15일 (수) 오전 8:49, Hyukjin Kwon 님이 작성: > Resending to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.5 (RC1)

2020-01-15 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
+1 On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, 08:24 Takeshi Yamamuro, wrote: > +1; > > I checked the links and materials, then I run the tests with > `-Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pmesos -Pkubernetes > -Psparkr` > on macOS (Java 8). > All the things look fine and I didn't see the error on my env >

Re: More publicly documenting the options under spark.sql.*

2020-01-15 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Resending to the dev list for archive purpose: I think automatically creating a configuration page isn't a bad idea because I think we deprecate and remove configurations which are not created via .internal() in SQLConf anyway. I already tried this automatic generation from the codes at SQL