Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader
Friendly reminder: the VOTE thread got 2 binding votes and needs 1 more binding vote to pass. On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:21 AM Bartosz Konieczny wrote: > +1 > > On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> L. C. Hsieh 于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道： >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Anish >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader. >>> >>> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data >>> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via >>> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests >>> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the >>> scenario of incident. >>> >>> References: >>> >>> JIRA ticket >>> SPIP doc >>> Discussion thread >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> >>> > > -- > Bartosz Konieczny > freelance data engineer > https://www.waitingforcode.com > https://github.com/bartosz25/ > https://twitter.com/waitingforcode > > >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader
+1 On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan wrote: > +1 > > L. C. Hsieh 于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道： > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Anish >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks! >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader. >> >> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data >> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via >> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests >> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the >> scenario of incident. >> >> References: >> >> JIRA ticket >> SPIP doc >> Discussion thread >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks! >> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) >> >> - >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >> -- Bartosz Konieczny freelance data engineer https://www.waitingforcode.com https://github.com/bartosz25/ https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader
+1 L. C. Hsieh 于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道： > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Anish > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim < > kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks! > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim < > kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader. > > The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data > source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via > batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests > with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the > scenario of incident. > > References: > > JIRA ticket > SPIP doc > Discussion thread > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > Thanks! > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
