Re: Apache Spark 3.2.3 Release?

+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, 8:58 PM 416161...@qq.com wrote: > +1 > > -- > Ruifeng Zheng > ruife...@foxmail.com > >

Re: Welcome Yikun Jiang as a Spark committer

Congratulations. Regards, Vaquar khan On Sun, Oct 9, 2022, 6:46 AM 叶先进 wrote: > Congrats > > On Oct 9, 2022, at 16:44, XiDuo You wrote: > > Congratulations, Yikun ! > > Maxim Gekk 于2022年10月9日周日 15:59写道： > >> Keep up the great work, Yikun! >> >> On S

Re: Welcoming three new PMC members

Congratulations On Tue, Aug 9, 2022, 11:40 AM Xiao Li wrote: > Hi all, > > The Spark PMC recently voted to add three new PMC members. Join me in > welcoming them to their new roles! > > New PMC members: Huaxin Gao, Gengliang Wang and Maxim Gekk > > The Spark PMC >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.4.2

+1 Regards, Vaquar khan On Sun, Apr 21, 2019, 11:19 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > > R tests, package tests on r-hub. Manually check commits under R, doc etc > > > -- > *From:* Sean Owen > *Sent:* Saturday, April 20, 2019 11:27 AM > *To:

Re: time for Apache Spark 3.0?

:02 PM, vaquar khan wrote: > Plz ignore last email link (you tube )not sure how it added . > Apologies not sure how to delete it. > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:58 AM, vaquar khan > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ik7aJ5U6kg >>

Re: time for Apache Spark 3.0?

Plz ignore last email link (you tube )not sure how it added . Apologies not sure how to delete it. On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:58 AM, vaquar khan wrote: > +1 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ik7aJ5U6kg > > Regards, > Vaquar khan > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:5

Re: time for Apache Spark 3.0?

+1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ik7aJ5U6kg Regards, Vaquar khan On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > Yes. At this rate I think it's better to do 2.4 next, followed by 3.0. > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:52 AM Mridul Muralidharan > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.3.0 (RC4)

+1 Regards, Vaquar khan On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. > > So far, no function/performance regression in Spark SQL, Core and PySpark. > > Thanks! > > Xiao > > 2018-02-19 19:47 GMT-08:00 Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@g

Re: [Vote] SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured Streaming

ch. >> > >> > >> > Following the SPIP process, I'm putting this SPIP up for a vote. >> > >> > +1: Let's go ahead and design / implement the SPIP. >> > +0: Don't really care. >> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >> > -- Regards, Vaquar Khan +1 -224-436-0783 Greater Chicago

Re: [VOTE][SPIP] SPARK-22026 data source v2 write path

+1 Regards, Vaquar khan On Oct 11, 2017 10:14 PM, "Weichen Xu" <weichen...@databricks.com> wrote: +1 On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Xiao > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 7:31 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databr

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

+1 (non binding ) tested on Ubuntu ,all test case are passed. Regards, Vaquar khan On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 too. > > > On 6 Oct 2017 10:49 am, "Reynold Xin" <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > > +1 >

Re: Interested to Contribute in Spark Development

Hi Nishant, 1) Start with helping spark users on mailing list and stack . 2) Start helping build and testing. 3) Once comfortable with code start working on Spark Jira. Regards, Vaquar khan On Oct 4, 2017 11:29 AM, "Kumar Nishant" <knishan...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC2)

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Vaquar khan On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked all signatures/checksums for binaries and source, spot-checked > maven artifacts. Thanks for fixing the signatures, Holden! > &

Re: Welcoming Tejas Patil as a Spark committer

Congrats Tejas Regards, Vaquar khan On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations Tejas ! > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE][SPIP] SPARK-21866 Image support in Apache Spark

+1 looks good, Regards, Vaquar khan On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1; we should consider something similar for multi-dimensional tensors too. > > Matei > > > On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Yanbo Liang <yblia...@g

Re: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path

+1 Regards, Vaquar khan On Sep 10, 2017 5:18 AM, "Noman Khan" <nomanbp...@live.com> wrote: > +1 > -- > *From:* wangzhenhua (G) <wangzhen...@huawei.com> > *Sent:* Friday, September 8, 2017 2:20:07 AM > *To:* Dongjoon Hyun; 蒋星博

Re: SPIP: Spark on Kubernetes

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Vaquar khan On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Erik Erlandson <eerla...@redhat.com> wrote: > > In addition to the engineering & software aspects of the native Kubernetes > community project, we have also worked at building out the community, with >

Re: How to tune the performance of Tpch query5 within Spark

Verify your configuration, following link covered all Spark tuning points. https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/tuning.html Regards, Vaquar khan On Jul 17, 2017 6:56 AM, "何文婷" <hewenting_...@163.com> wrote: 2.1.1 发自网易邮箱大师 On 07/17/2017 20:55, vaquar khan <vaquar.k...@gmail

Re: How to tune the performance of Tpch query5 within Spark

Could you please let us know your Spark version? Regards, vaquar khan On Jul 17, 2017 12:18 AM, "163" <hewenting_...@163.com> wrote: > I change the UDF but the performance seems still slow. What can I do else? > > > 在 2017年7月14日，下午8:34，Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gm

Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.2.0 (RC4)

+1 non-binding Regards, vaquar khan On Jun 7, 2017 4:32 PM, "Ricardo Almeida" <ricardo.alme...@actnowib.com> wrote: +1 (non-binding) Built and tested with -Phadoop-2.7 -Dhadoop.version=2.7.3 -Pyarn -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pscala-2.11 on - Ubuntu 17.04, Java 8 (O

Re: Spark Improvement Proposals

Many of us have issue with "shepherd role " , i think we should go with vote. Regards, Vaquar khan On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > I'm fine without a vote. (are we voting on wether we need a vote?) > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 20

Re: Spark Improvement Proposals

I like document and happy to see SPIP draft version however i feel shepherd role is again hurdle in process improvement ,It's like everything depends only on shepherd . Also want to add point that SPIP should be time bound with define SLA else will defeats purpose. Regards, Vaquar khan On Thu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.0 (RC5)

+1 (non-binding) Regards, vaquar khan On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Adam Roberts <arobe...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > *Functional*: looks good, tested with OpenJDK 8 (1.8.0_111) and IBM's > latest SDK for Java (8 SR3 FP21). > > Tests run clean on Ubun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

found at: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0. >>>>> 2-rc3-docs/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Q: How can I help test this release? >>>>> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC1)

elease. > > > > Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0 from > > now on? > > A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.3, rather than 2.0.2. If a new RC > > (i.e. RC2) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to > 2.0.2. > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > -- Regards, Vaquar Khan +1 -224-436-0783 IT Architect / Lead Consultant Greater Chicago

Re: Spark Improvement Proposals

+1 for SIP lebles,waiting for Reynolds detailed proposal . Regards, Vaquar khan On 8 Oct 2016 16:22, "Matei Zaharia" <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good. Just to comment on the compatibility part: > > > I meant changing public user interface

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.1 (RC4)

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Vaquar khan On 29 Sep 2016 23:00, "Denny Lee" <denny.g@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:43 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.1 (RC3)

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Vaquar khan On 25 Sep 2016 20:41, "Kousuke Saruta" <saru...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 2016年09月26日 07:26, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:05

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.1 (RC2)

+1 non binding No issue found. Regards, Vaquar khan On 23 Sep 2016 17:25, "Mark Hamstra" <m...@clearstorydata.com> wrote: Similar but not identical configuration (Java 8/macOs 10.12 with build/mvn -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Phadoop-2.7 -Pyarn clean install); Similar but not i

Re: renaming "minor release" to "feature release"

manner, and 3. PATCH version when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes. Apart from verbiage "Minor" with "feature" no other changes in versioning policy. regards, Vaquar khan On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.6.2 (RC2)

+1 (non-binding Regards, Vaquar khan On 23 Jun 2016 07:50, "Sean Owen" <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I don't think that qualifies as a blocker; not even clear it's a > regression. Even non-binding votes here should focus on whether this > is OK to release as a ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.6.0 (RC4)

+1 On 24 Dec 2015 22:01, "Vinay Shukla" wrote: > +1 > Tested on HDP 2.3, YARN cluster mode, spark-shell > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Allen Zhang > wrote: > >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> I have just tarball a new binary and tested

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.5.1 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Vaquar khan On 25 Sep 2015 18:28, "Eugene Zhulenev" <eugene.zhule...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Running latest build from 1.5 branch, SO much more stable than 1.5.0 > release. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Doug Balog <doug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.5.0 (RC2)

+1 (1.5.0 RC2)Compiled on Windows with YARN. Regards, Vaquar khan +1 (non-binding, of course) 1. Compiled OSX 10.10 (Yosemite) OK Total time: 42:36 min mvn clean package -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.6 -DskipTests 2. Tested pyspark, mllib 2.1. statistics (min,max,mean,Pearson,Spearman) OK 2.2. Linear

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.4.1

+1 On 2 Jul 2015 18:03, shenyan zhen shenya...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Jun 30, 2015 8:28 PM, Reynold Xin r...@databricks.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version

Re: Contribution in java

Hi Sreenivas, Please read Spark doc first, everything mention in doc , without reading doc how can you contribute ? regards, vaquar khan On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:00 PM, sreenivas putta putta.sreeni...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to contribute for spark in java. Does it support java? please

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.2.0 (RC1)

+1 1 Compiled binaries 2 All Tests Pass Regards, Vaquar khan On 30 Nov 2014 04:21, Krishna Sankar ksanka...@gmail.com wrote: +1 1. Compiled OSX 10.10 (Yosemite) mvn -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.4 -Dhadoop.version=2.4.0 -DskipTests clean package 16:46 min (slightly slower connection) 2. Tested pyspark

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.1.1 (RC2)

+1 Release this package as Apache Spark 1.1.1 On 20 Nov 2014 04:22, Andrew Or and...@databricks.com wrote: I will start with a +1 2014-11-19 14:51 GMT-08:00 Andrew Or and...@databricks.com: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 1 .1.1. This release

Re: [VOTE] Designating maintainers for some Spark components

+1 (binding) On 8 Nov 2014 07:26, Davies Liu dav...@databricks.com wrote: Sorry for my last email, I misunderstood the proposal here, all the committer still have equal -1 to all the code changes. Also, as mentioned in the proposal, the sign off only happens to public API and architect,