Thanks for the prompt feedback; I have further expanded on your
suggestions on this JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7754
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> Overall this seems like a reasonable proposal to me. Here are a few
> thoughts:
>
> - There is som
Overall this seems like a reasonable proposal to me. Here are a few
thoughts:
- There is some debugging utility to the ruleName, so we would probably
want to at least make that an argument to the rule function.
- We also have had rules that operate on SparkPlan, though since there is
only one A
Hi everybody,
At the moment, Catalyst rules are defined using two different types of rules:
`Rule[LogicalPlan]` and `Strategy` (which in turn maps to
`GenericStrategy[SparkPlan]`).
I propose to introduce utility methods to
a) reduce the boilerplate to define rewrite rules
b) turning them bac
