[RESULT] [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

This SPIP is adopted with the following +1 votes and no -1 or +0 votes: Holden Karau* John Zhuge Chao Sun Dongjoon Hyun* Russell Spitzer DB Tsai* Wenchen Fan* Kent Yao Huaxin Gao Liang-Chi Hsieh Jungtaek Lim Hyukjin Kwon* Gengliang Wang kordex Takeshi Yamamuro Ryan Blue * = binding On Mon, Mar

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

And a late +1 from me. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:46 AM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote: > +1, too. > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:51 PM kordex wrote: > >> +1 (for what it's worth). It will definitely help our efforts. >> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:14 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: >> > >> > +1

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1, too. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:51 PM kordex wrote: > +1 (for what it's worth). It will definitely help our efforts. > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:14 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:00 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (for what it's worth). It will definitely help our efforts. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:14 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:00 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> 2021년 3월 12일 (금) 오후 2:54, Jungtaek Lim 님이 작성: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) Excellent

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:00 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > 2021년 3월 12일 (금) 오후 2:54, Jungtaek Lim 님이 > 작성: > >> +1 (non-binding) Excellent description on SPIP doc! Thanks for the >> amazing effort! >> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:19 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote: >> >>> >>> +1

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 2021년 3월 12일 (금) 오후 2:54, Jungtaek Lim 님이 작성: > +1 (non-binding) Excellent description on SPIP doc! Thanks for the amazing > effort! > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:19 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote: > >> >> +1 (non-binding). >> >> Thanks for the work! >> >> >> Erik Krogen wrote >> > +1 from me

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding) Excellent description on SPIP doc! Thanks for the amazing effort! On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:19 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks for the work! > > > Erik Krogen wrote > > +1 from me (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:27 AM huaxin gao > > >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the work! Erik Krogen wrote > +1 from me (non-binding) > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:27 AM huaxin gao > huaxin.gao11@ > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 from me (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:27 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:12 AM Kent Yao wrote: > >> +1, looks great! >> >> *Kent Yao * >> @ Data Science Center, Hangzhou Research Institute, NetEase Corp. >> *a spark enthusiast* >> *kyuubi

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:12 AM Kent Yao wrote: > +1, looks great! > > *Kent Yao * > @ Data Science Center, Hangzhou Research Institute, NetEase Corp. > *a spark enthusiast* > *kyuubi is a unified multi-tenant JDBC > interface for large-scale

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1, looks great! Kent Yao @ Data Science Center, Hangzhou Research Institute, NetEase Corp.a spark enthusiastkyuubiis a unified 

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:47 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (for what it's worth) > > Thanks for making such a robust proposal, i'm excited to see the new work > coming from this > > On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:44 PM, Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thank you, Ryan. > >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (for what it's worth) Thanks for making such a robust proposal, i'm excited to see the new work coming from this > On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:44 PM, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thank you, Ryan. > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:20 PM Chao Sun

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (binding) Thank you, Ryan. Bests, Dongjoon. On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:20 PM Chao Sun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:13 PM John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:32 PM Holden Karau wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 8,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:13 PM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:32 PM Holden Karau wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, I’d like to start a vote for the FunctionCatalog design >>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:32 PM Holden Karau wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Hi everyone, I’d like to start a vote for the FunctionCatalog design >> proposal (SPIP). >> >> The proposal is to add a FunctionCatalog interface that can

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

+1 (binding) On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, I’d like to start a vote for the FunctionCatalog design > proposal (SPIP). > > The proposal is to add a FunctionCatalog interface that can be used to > load and list functions for Spark to call. There are interfaces for

[VOTE] SPIP: Add FunctionCatalog

Hi everyone, I’d like to start a vote for the FunctionCatalog design proposal (SPIP). The proposal is to add a FunctionCatalog interface that can be used to load and list functions for Spark to call. There are interfaces for scalar and aggregate functions. In the discussion we’ve come to