[RESULT] [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-20 Thread Ryan Blue
Hyun Bruce Robbins On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:43 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > > > -- > *From:* Bruce Robbins > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:02 PM > *To:* Ryan Blue > *Cc:* Spark Dev List > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQ

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 From: Bruce Robbins Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:02 PM To: Ryan Blue Cc: Spark Dev List Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue mailto:b...@apache.org>> wrote: Hi ev

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Bruce Robbins
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we > have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for > DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
+1 (non-binding). Bests, Dongjoon. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:32 AM Henry Robinson wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > >> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will >> remove the existing plans. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Henry Robinson
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will > remove the existing plans. > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> From discussion on the proposal doc and the

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Reynold Xin
+1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will remove the existing plans. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we > have consensus around the plan to standardize

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Alessandro Solimando
+1 (non-binding) On 18 July 2018 at 17:32, Xiao Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation > sketch is not part of this vote. > > Cheers, > > Xiao > > 2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Jul 18,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Xiao Li
+1 (binding) Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation sketch is not part of this vote. Cheers, Xiao 2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer : > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> On Wed, 18

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Russell Spitzer
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-18 Thread Marco Gaido
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-17 Thread Takeshi Yamamuro
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, >> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and >>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-17 Thread John Zhuge
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, > compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and > doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. > > On Wed, Jul

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-17 Thread Wenchen Fan
+1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (not binding) > > On Tue, Jul 17,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-17 Thread Ryan Blue
+1 (not binding) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we > have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for > DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the

[VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans

2018-07-17 Thread Ryan Blue
Hi everyone, >From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans