Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Jungtaek Lim]

Thanks all for participating! The vote passed. I'll send out the result to
a separate thread.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:52 AM Yuepeng Pan  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Roc
>
> At 2023-10-23 12:23:52, "Jungtaek Lim" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>
> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source
> which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch
> query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with
> verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario
> of incident.
>
> References:
>
>- JIRA ticket 
>- SPIP doc
>
> 
>- Discussion thread
>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
>

Re:[VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Yuepeng Pan]

+1 (non-binding)



Regards,
Roc



At 2023-10-23 12:23:52, "Jungtaek Lim"  wrote:

Hi all,


I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.


The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source which 
enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch query. This 
would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with verifying state 
store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario of incident.



References:
JIRA ticket
SPIP doc

Discussion thread

Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:


[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …



Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Shixiong Zhu]

+1

Best Regards,
Shixiong Zhu


On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:20 PM Yuanjian Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> Jungtaek Lim  于2023年10月25日周三 01:06写道：
>
>> Friendly reminder: the VOTE thread got 2 binding votes and needs 1 more
>> binding vote to pass.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:21 AM Bartosz Konieczny <
>> bartkoniec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan  wrote:
>>>
 +1

 L. C. Hsieh  于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道：

> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anish
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
> 
>  The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data
> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via
> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests
> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the
> scenario of incident.
> 
>  References:
> 
>  JIRA ticket
>  SPIP doc
>  Discussion thread
> 
>  Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
> 
>  [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>  [ ] +0
>  [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
> 
>  Thanks!
>  Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bartosz Konieczny
>>> freelance data engineer
>>> https://www.waitingforcode.com
>>> https://github.com/bartosz25/
>>> https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Yuanjian Li]

+1

Jungtaek Lim  于2023年10月25日周三 01:06写道：

> Friendly reminder: the VOTE thread got 2 binding votes and needs 1 more
> binding vote to pass.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:21 AM Bartosz Konieczny 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan  wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> L. C. Hsieh  于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道：
>>>
 +1

 On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
  wrote:
 >
 > +1 (non-binding)
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Anish
 >
 > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan 
 wrote:
 >>
 >> +1
 >>
 >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <
 kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
 >>>
 >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
 kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
 
  The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data
 source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via
 batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests
 with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the
 scenario of incident.
 
  References:
 
  JIRA ticket
  SPIP doc
  Discussion thread
 
  Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
 
  [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
 
  Thanks!
  Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

 -
 To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org


>>
>> --
>> Bartosz Konieczny
>> freelance data engineer
>> https://www.waitingforcode.com
>> https://github.com/bartosz25/
>> https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
>>
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Jungtaek Lim]

Friendly reminder: the VOTE thread got 2 binding votes and needs 1 more
binding vote to pass.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:21 AM Bartosz Konieczny 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> L. C. Hsieh  于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道：
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
>>>  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Anish
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Hi all,
>>> 
>>>  I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>>> 
>>>  The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data
>>> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via
>>> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests
>>> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the
>>> scenario of incident.
>>> 
>>>  References:
>>> 
>>>  JIRA ticket
>>>  SPIP doc
>>>  Discussion thread
>>> 
>>>  Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>> 
>>>  [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>  [ ] +0
>>>  [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>> 
>>>  Thanks!
>>>  Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Bartosz Konieczny
> freelance data engineer
> https://www.waitingforcode.com
> https://github.com/bartosz25/
> https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Bartosz Konieczny]

+1

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, Jia Fan  wrote:

> +1
>
> L. C. Hsieh  于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Anish
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  Hi all,
>> 
>>  I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>> 
>>  The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data
>> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via
>> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests
>> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the
>> scenario of incident.
>> 
>>  References:
>> 
>>  JIRA ticket
>>  SPIP doc
>>  Discussion thread
>> 
>>  Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>> 
>>  [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>  [ ] +0
>>  [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>> 
>>  Thanks!
>>  Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>

-- 
Bartosz Konieczny
freelance data engineer
https://www.waitingforcode.com
https://github.com/bartosz25/
https://twitter.com/waitingforcode

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Jia Fan]

+1

L. C. Hsieh  于2023年10月24日周二 13:23写道：

> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anish
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan  wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
> 
>  The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data
> source which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via
> batch query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests
> with verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the
> scenario of incident.
> 
>  References:
> 
>  JIRA ticket
>  SPIP doc
>  Discussion thread
> 
>  Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
> 
>  [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>  [ ] +0
>  [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
> 
>  Thanks!
>  Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[L. C. Hsieh]

+1

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Anish Shrigondekar
 wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Anish
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim  
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim  
>>> wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.

 The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source 
 which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch 
 query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with 
 verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario 
 of incident.

 References:

 JIRA ticket
 SPIP doc
 Discussion thread

 Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:

 [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …

 Thanks!
 Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Anish Shrigondekar]

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Anish

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Wenchen Fan  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim 
> wrote:
>
>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>>>
>>> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source
>>> which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch
>>> query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with
>>> verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario
>>> of incident.
>>>
>>> References:
>>>
>>>- JIRA ticket 
>>>- SPIP doc
>>>
>>> 
>>>- Discussion thread
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Wenchen Fan]

+1

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim 
wrote:

> Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>>
>> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source
>> which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch
>> query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with
>> verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario
>> of incident.
>>
>> References:
>>
>>- JIRA ticket 
>>- SPIP doc
>>
>> 
>>- Discussion thread
>>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Jungtaek Lim]

Starting with my +1 (non-binding). Thanks!

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jungtaek Lim 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.
>
> The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source
> which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch
> query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with
> verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario
> of incident.
>
> References:
>
>- JIRA ticket 
>- SPIP doc
>
> 
>- Discussion thread
>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>

[VOTE] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

[Jungtaek Lim]

Hi all,

I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: State Data Source - Reader.

The high level summary of the SPIP is that we propose a new data source
which enables a read ability for state store in the checkpoint, via batch
query. This would enable two major use cases 1) constructing tests with
verifying state store 2) inspecting values in state store in the scenario
of incident.

References:

   - JIRA ticket 
   - SPIP doc
   

   - Discussion thread
   

Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:

[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)