Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-07 Thread Holden Karau
This vote passes. Thanks to everyone for testing and helping work out the challenges with a different release flow & a new RM :) Since I'm only a committer not PMC member there are some additional steps involved to make the release available so thanks for your patience in advance. +1: Sean Owen

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-07 Thread Ricardo Almeida
+1 (non-binding) Built and tested on - macOS 10.12.5 Java 8 (build 1.8.0_131) - Ubuntu 17.04, Java 8 (OpenJDK 1.8.0_111) On 3 October 2017 at 08:24, Holden Karau wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2 > .1.2. The vote

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-06 Thread DB Tsai
ing issue on RHEL > with respect to forking. > > > From: Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 6:16:53 AM > To: Hyukjin Kwon > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) > > Ah yes - I recall that

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-06 Thread Felix Cheung
Thanks Nick, Hyukjin. Yes this seems to be a longer standing issue on RHEL with respect to forking. From: Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 6:16:53 AM To: Hyukjin Kwon Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) Ah y

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-06 Thread Nick Pentreath
Ah yes - I recall that it was fixed. Forgot it was for 2.3.0 My +1 vote stands. On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 15:15 Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I believe that R test failure is due to SPARK-21093, at least the error > message looks the same, and that is fixed from 2.3.0.

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-06 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Hi Nick, I believe that R test failure is due to SPARK-21093, at least the error message looks the same, and that is fixed from 2.3.0. This was not backported because I and reviewers were worried as that fixed a very core to SparkR (even, it was reverted once even after very close look by some

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-06 Thread Nick Pentreath
Checked sigs & hashes. Tested on RHEL build/mvn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Pyarn test passed Python tests passed I ran R tests and am getting some failures: https://gist.github.com/MLnick/ddf4d531d5125208771beee0cc9c697e (I seem to recall similar issues on a previous release but I thought it was

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-05 Thread vaquar khan
+1 (non binding ) tested on Ubuntu ,all test case are passed. Regards, Vaquar khan On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 too. > > > On 6 Oct 2017 10:49 am, "Reynold Xin" wrote: > > +1 > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Holden

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-05 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
+1 too. On 6 Oct 2017 10:49 am, "Reynold Xin" wrote: +1 On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Holden Karau wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2 > .1.2. The vote is open until Saturday October 7th at 9:00

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-05 Thread Reynold Xin
+1 On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Holden Karau wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2 > .1.2. The vote is open until Saturday October 7th at 9:00 PST and passes > if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-05 Thread Denny Lee
this isn't a >> regression, and hence my +1. >> >> btw, I think we need to update this file for the new keys used in signing >> this release https://www.apache.org/dist/spark/KEYS >> >> >> _____ >> From: Liwei Lin <lwl...@g

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-05 Thread Holden Karau
rk/KEYS > > > _ > From: Liwei Lin <lwl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 6:51 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) > To: Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org> > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Cheer

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-04 Thread Felix Cheung
/dist/spark/KEYS _ From: Liwei Lin <lwl...@gmail.com<mailto:lwl...@gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 6:51 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) To: Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev@spark.apache.org>> +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-04 Thread Liwei Lin
+1 (non-binding) Cheers, Liwei On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Nick Pentreath wrote: > Ah right! Was using a new cloud instance and didn't realize I was logged > in as root! thanks > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:13 Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > >> Maybe

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-04 Thread Nick Pentreath
Ah right! Was using a new cloud instance and didn't realize I was logged in as root! thanks On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:13 Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > Maybe you're running as root (or the admin account on your OS)? > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Nick Pentreath >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
Maybe you're running as root (or the admin account on your OS)? On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Nick Pentreath wrote: > Hmm I'm consistently getting this error in core tests: > > - SPARK-3697: ignore directories that cannot be read. *** FAILED *** > 2 was not equal

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Nick Pentreath
Hmm I'm consistently getting this error in core tests: - SPARK-3697: ignore directories that cannot be read. *** FAILED *** 2 was not equal to 1 (FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala:146) Anyone else? Any insight? Perhaps it's my set up. >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:24 AM Holden Karau

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Ryan Blue
>> >> [INFO] Total time: 54:28 min >> [INFO] Finished at: 2017-10-03T23:53:33+09:00 >> [INFO] Final Memory: 112M/322M >> [INFO] >> ---- >> [

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Wenchen Fan
> > > > > From:Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> > To:Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org> > Date:2017/10/03 23:23 > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) > -- > > > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Kazuaki Ishizaki
oon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> To: Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org> Date: 2017/10/03 23:23 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) +1 (non-binding) Dongjoon. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier < hvanhov...@databricks.com> wrote: +1

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
+1 (non-binding) Dongjoon. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier < hvanhov...@databricks.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > >> +1 same as last RC. Tests pass, sigs and hashes are OK. >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier
+1 On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > +1 same as last RC. Tests pass, sigs and hashes are OK. > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:24 AM Holden Karau wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >> 2.1.2.

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Sean Owen
+1 same as last RC. Tests pass, sigs and hashes are OK. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:24 AM Holden Karau wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2 > .1.2. The vote is open until Saturday October 7th at 9:00 PST and passes > if a

[VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

2017-10-03 Thread Holden Karau
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2 .1.2. The vote is open until Saturday October 7th at 9:00 PST and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...