I see. I was just curious as I find myself hesitating when I open a PR time
to time.
Thank you both for echoing!
On 14 Nov 2016 5:02 a.m., "Sean Owen" wrote:
> Yes they really correspond to, if anything, the categories at
> spark-prs.appspot.com . They aren't that consistently used however and
Yes they really correspond to, if anything, the categories at
spark-prs.appspot.com . They aren't that consistently used however and
there isn't really a definite list. It is really mostly of use for the fact
that it tags emails in a way people can filter semi-effectively. So I think
we have left i
Hi Hyukjin,
What's worked for me so the Spark committers have accepted was to use
the first group
SQL, MLlib, Core, Python, Scheduler, Build, Docs, Streaming, Mesos,
Web UI, YARN, GraphX, R
with all the letters uppercase.
It's less to remember so I'd vote for keeping it in use (or be acceptable
Hi all,
First of all, this might be minor but I just have been curious of different
PR titles in particular component part. So, I looked through Spark wiki
again and I found the description not quite the same with the PRs.
It seems, it is said,
Pull Request
...
1.
The PR title should
