> On 25 May 2016, at 23:08, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> Yeah I think using labels is fine -- just not if they're for someone's
> internal purpose. I don't have a problem with using meaningful labels
> if they're meaningful to everyone. In fact, I'd rather be using labels
> rather than "umbrella" JIRAs.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> I think the risk is everybody starts following this, then this will be
> unmanageable, given the size of the number of organizations involved.
>
> The two main labels that we actually use are starter + releasenotes.
>
>
Well, if we consider th
I think the risk is everybody starts following this, then this will be
unmanageable, given the size of the number of organizations involved.
The two main labels that we actually use are starter + releasenotes.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at
Yeah I think using labels is fine -- just not if they're for someone's
internal purpose. I don't have a problem with using meaningful labels
if they're meaningful to everyone. In fact, I'd rather be using labels
rather than "umbrella" JIRAs.
Labels I have removed as unuseful are ones like "patch"
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I don't think we generally use labels at all except "starter". I
> sometimes remove labels when I'm editing a JIRA otherwise, perhaps to
> make that point. I don't recall doing this recently.
>
We have used for other things in the past, like to
> interest on them, so it's easier to share a query and check the status on
> them. But I noticed that these labels were removed.
>
> Are there any issues with labeling jiras ? Any other suggestions ?
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Re
I recently used labels to mark couple jiras that me and my team have some
interest on them, so it's easier to share a query and check the status on
them. But I noticed that these labels were removed.
Are there any issues with labeling jiras ? Any other suggestions ?
--
Luciano Resende