Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Prashant Sharma]

Yes, That should be changed to 2.11.7. Mind sending a patch ?

Prashant Sharma



On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM, zzc <441586...@qq.com> wrote:

> hi, rxin, in pom.xml file, 'scala.version' still is 2.10.5, does  it need
> to
> be modified to 2.11.7?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16207.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[zzc]

Hi Prashant Sharma, i saw that there already were some pr submitted by
Luciano Resende:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11074
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16222.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Luciano Resende]

There were few more issues, I have started tracking them at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13189

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Prashant Sharma 
wrote:

> Yes, That should be changed to 2.11.7. Mind sending a patch ?
>
> Prashant Sharma
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM, zzc <441586...@qq.com> wrote:
>
>> hi, rxin, in pom.xml file, 'scala.version' still is 2.10.5, does  it need
>> to
>> be modified to 2.11.7?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16207.html
>> Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Sean Owen]

Many of these changes are not needed - please see how the profiles work.
Please also open 1 PR for one logical change and not 4.

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 06:03 zzc <441586...@qq.com> wrote:

> Hi Prashant Sharma, i saw that there already were some pr submitted by
> Luciano Resende:
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11074
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16222.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[zzc]

hi, rxin, in pom.xml file, 'scala.version' still is 2.10.5, does  it need to
be modified to 2.11.7?



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16207.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Jakob Odersky]

Awesome!
+1 on Steve Loughran's question, how does this affect support for
2.10? Do future contributions need to work with Scala 2.10?

cheers

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Ted Yu  wrote:
> The following jobs have been established for build against Scala 2.10:
>
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.10/
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.10/
>
> FYI
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Steve Loughran 
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2016, at 08:22, Reynold Xin  wrote:
>>
>> FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
>> default build.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
>>
>>
>>
>> does this mean that Spark 2.10 compatibility & testing are no longer
>> needed?
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Reynold Xin]

Yes they do. We haven't dropped 2.10 support yet. There are too many 2.10
active deployments out there.


On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jakob Odersky  wrote:

> Awesome!
> +1 on Steve Loughran's question, how does this affect support for
> 2.10? Do future contributions need to work with Scala 2.10?
>
> cheers
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Ted Yu  wrote:
> > The following jobs have been established for build against Scala 2.10:
> >
> >
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.10/
> >
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.10/
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Steve Loughran 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30 Jan 2016, at 08:22, Reynold Xin  wrote:
> >>
> >> FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
> >> default build.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> does this mean that Spark 2.10 compatibility & testing are no longer
> >> needed?
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Steve Loughran]

On 30 Jan 2016, at 08:22, Reynold Xin 
> wrote:

FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the default 
build.

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608



does this mean that Spark 2.10 compatibility & testing are no longer needed?

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Ted Yu]

The following jobs have been established for build against Scala 2.10:

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.10/
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.10/

FYI

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Steve Loughran 
wrote:

>
> On 30 Jan 2016, at 08:22, Reynold Xin  wrote:
>
> FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
> default build.
>
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
>
>
>
> does this mean that Spark 2.10 compatibility & testing are no longer
> needed?
>

Scala 2.11 default build

[Reynold Xin]

FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
default build.

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Driesprong, Fokko]

Nice, good work!

I've been using a Docker container to compile against 2.11:
https://github.com/fokko/docker-spark

Cheers, Fokko


2016-01-30 9:22 GMT+01:00 Reynold Xin :

> FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
> default build.
>
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
>
>

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

[Ted Yu]

Does this mean the following Jenkins builds can be disabled ?

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.11/
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.11/

Cheers

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Driesprong, Fokko 
wrote:

> Nice, good work!
>
> I've been using a Docker container to compile against 2.11:
> https://github.com/fokko/docker-spark
>
> Cheers, Fokko
>
>
> 2016-01-30 9:22 GMT+01:00 Reynold Xin :
>
>> FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the
>> default build.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
>>
>>
>