Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Rafa, Great news, but I cannot modify the final proposal since I had submitted a PDF format, and I cannot edit after the deadline. However, I can edit the proposal in Google Doc, and detail the new tasks that will be implemented. What do you think? Regards, ~Kamila. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Kamila, I could made an effort an tried to co-mentor the project, but prior to that you would have to modify and extend your proposal covering the new discussed tasks. That could take you some time, I'm not sure even if you are allowed to modify the proposal at this point On Fri, Apr 6, 2018

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi, Thanks Rafa, that sounds cool. That is the reason I wanted to leave open the possibility to work on a different activity. Will you be up to mentor this task with Andreas? According to the timeline [1], organizations are reviewing and selecting proposals. ~Regards, Kamila. [1]

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Rupert, Thanks for your answer. I was seeing STANBOL-320 mostly as data cleaning/management issue. I will try to describe the scope and possible solutions. However, until we define that, I think it is better to leave my proposal with an open issue. Just to reiterate, I can say that I will

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi, Disambiguation is interesting for sure, but also a very broad topic. So please make sure to describe scope and possible solutions (e.g. approach + frameworks) to the problem. A dummy example based on STANBOL-320 this could be * approach: process extracted named entities; filter all with

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi, I am working into my proposal. I think it would be a good a idea to define some ground work that I can work after moving to Squebi. I was looking at some of the issues, and there are some really interesting However, I am afraid mostly for the time. Specifically, since I have been doing and

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi, Great Antonio , thanks!! :D Then, I would keep working in my proposal and share with you for some feedback. Also, can we define some issues that I can work on? Or what could be the extra work? Until then, I will look at some issues/code to get some idea of the work. Regards, ~Kamila. On

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Andreas, I don't have a plenty of time this year, but I think I can find a bit of time and act as a mentor for this GSoC year. Regards 2018-03-10 4:53 GMT+01:00 Kamila Molina Orellana : > Hi all, > > Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi all, Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql Endpoint instead of the one being used now [1]. However, Rupert point out that task would be really short. So, I say we can add some issues too. Or what do you suggest? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1327

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Andreas, Can you or the student elaborate here a little bit the idea for the project? Thanks On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:26 AM Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Hi Kamila and Rupert, > > Sorry for my very belated reply. > > The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Kamila and Rupert, Sorry for my very belated reply. The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that it could be resolved in a GSOC-project. Yes, it alone would not be enough for such a project and therefore significantly more work would need to be included. The main problem seems

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Thanks Rupert for you answer. I understand it. I was really interested in Stanbol, so I guess I will keep looking at some other project for GSoC. However, If anyone is interested in mentoring, I am still looking forward to contribute. Regards, ~Kamila. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Rupert

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Kamila Stanbol has very little ongoing development - mostly fixing bugs. While their are for sure topics of interests - especially related to information extraction and classification - I do not know if we would be able to find 2 Developers plan to be active enough for Mentoring. For me the

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Rupert. Thanks so much Rupert for your answer. Do you think the project will go for GSoC? I have been looking at Squebi, and if it is too short, we can try to fix some other issue. Regards, ~Kamila. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi Kamila, Sorry for the late response, but I wanted wait for Andreas to answer this as I do not really agree with him tagging STANBOL-1327 with GSoC2018. IMHO this would be not a good topic as it is much to simple and small (I would expect a maximum of 2 working days to complete this feature).

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

Hi, I have been working in my proposal and wanted to make the most of bounding period by interacting with the community and the tool. I have been working in the proposal and would like to share it with my prospective mentor. Anyone from Apache who would like to mentorship? Regards, ~Kamila. On