In light of that info,
+1
-Original Message-
From: Tim Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:37 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0
Our experience with our customer base indicates that MSVC 7.0
The issue should be linked as a duplicate of STDCXX-614 and
on closing the Status set to Duplicate. We might also need
to edit the time tracking info so we don't throw off our
reporting (I don't know if it would).
Martin
Eric Lemings (JIRA) wrote:
[
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:03 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Reply-To for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm wondering if that's what we want.
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
The 0.fnmatch test fails on MSVC and ICC/Windows with two assertions:
--
291. rw_fnmatch([!a], , 0) == 0, expected (native:own) 1:1
301. rw_fnmatch([!ab], , 0) == 0, expected (native:own) 1:1
--
The
