It's time for our report to the board...
what would we like to share?
I see:
o renewed discussion on health/viability of pmc
o increased development being done
o PMC expressing interest in moving to git
On 09/11/12 08:15, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's time for our report to the board...
what would we like to share?
I see:
o renewed discussion on health/viability of pmc
o increased development being done
o PMC expressing interest in moving to git
This sounds about right. It should also
() with
minimal locking, which passes the MT tests and does not break ABI:
s247136804.onlinehome.us/stdcxx-1056-20120911/punct.cpp
And the same for include/loc/_numpunct.h:
http://s247136804.onlinehome.us/stdcxx-1056-20120911/_numpunct.h
In _numpunct.h, all the functions perform no checks and no lazy
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
AFAICT, there are two cases to consider:
1. Using STDCXX locale database initializes the __rw_punct_t data in the
first, properly synchronized pass through __rw_get_numpunct. All subsequent
calls use the __rw_punct_t
