I also tested with POSIX mutexes and saw the same behavior.
Travis
From: Liviu Nicoara
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:28 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: STDCXX-1072 SPARC V8 mutex alignment requirements
I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC mac
iu Nicoara
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:28 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: STDCXX-1072 SPARC V8 mutex alignment requirements
>
> I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC machine
> could give it a runall and post the results
I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC machine
could give it a runall and post the results here it would be awesome. I
will postpone closing the incident until then.
Thanks!
Liviu
On 10/06/12 16:56, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 09/29/12 15:33, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 9/2
On 09/29/12 15:33, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 9/28/12 11:32 AM, Travis Vitek wrote:
[...] I think an even cleaner solution is to switch
to using __rw_aligned_buffer instead. It gives us a single point of
failure for alignment issues like this, and it makes the code
self-documenting and easier to r