Hi Martin,
> Yes, the configure machinery wasn't design with cross compilation
> in mind. We could probably eliminate some, even may, of the runtime
> tests and replace with them compilation (plus linking) only tests.
> Besides making cross compilation easier, doing so would also speed
> up the co
Martin,
Done (in Jira).
Thanks,
Wojciech
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:mse...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 September 2010 15:59
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Cc: Wojciech Meyer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-1051: Stdcxx build process needs to be able to
run configuration executable fil
On 09/20/2010 06:46 AM, Wojciech Meyer wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to cross compile stdcxx library. The problem we are facing
is that there is no way of telling stdcxx build system, that we don't
want to run configuration files created by configuration step by build
system directly on a host sys
Wojciech Meyer wrote:
C. Bergström wrote:
We have ported stdcxx over to cmake and will likely be cross compiling.
(mingw and other targets) When the work is more complete I'll ping you
for early testing.
Thanks.
That's a good news. Please do a pull request on
> C. Bergström wrote:
> > We have ported stdcxx over to cmake and will likely be cross compiling.
> > (mingw and other targets) When the work is more complete I'll ping you
> > for early testing.
> Thanks.
> That's a good news. Please do a pull request on ML once it's working.
BTW: We will h
C. Bergström wrote:
> We have ported stdcxx over to cmake and will likely be cross compiling.
> (mingw and other targets) When the work is more complete I'll ping you
> for early testing.
Thanks.
That's a good news. Please do a pull request on ML once it's working.
Wojciech
Wojciech Meyer wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to cross compile stdcxx library. The problem we are facing
is that there is no way of telling stdcxx build system, that we don't
want to run configuration files created by configuration step by build
system directly on a host system (through a shel