I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC machine
could give it a runall and post the results here it would be awesome. I
will postpone closing the incident until then.
Thanks!
Liviu
On 10/06/12 16:56, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 09/29/12 15:33, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 9/28/12 11:32 AM, Travis Vitek wrote:
[...] I think an even cleaner solution is to switch
to using __rw_aligned_buffer instead. It gives us a single point of
failure for alignment issues like this, and it makes the code
self-documenting and easier to read.
I am attaching another patch here, which makes use of the
__rw_aligned_buffer, slightly more verbose but the code is slightly
cleaner.
If there are no objections, I would check it in sometime after this
week-end.
Liviu
