Re: [jira] [Closed] (STDCXX-1066) SPARCV8 requires pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t to be aligned on an 8-byte boundary

2012-09-27 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms: On 09/26/12 05:49, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote: 2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms: On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page

Re: [jira] [Closed] (STDCXX-1066) SPARCV8 requires pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t to be aligned on an 8-byte boundary

2012-09-26 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms: On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anybody around here, except Stefan, who has access to a SPARC V8

Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]

2012-09-05 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
2012/9/5 Stefan Teleman stefan.tele...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: That is good, right? Yes, it is good. :-) Could not get an Intel build off the ground on the account of the LIMITS.cpp test not running to completion because of a

Re: New chair and/or attic

2012-08-31 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
2012/8/31 Stefan Teleman stefan.tele...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma tropikha...@gmail.com wrote: well, it's half year since revival of the project was announced and has there been any progress/improvements? The state of this is a koma at best

Re: New chair and/or attic

2012-08-30 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
On Aug 30, 2012 2:58 PM, C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote: On 08/30/12 07:29 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote: On 08/30/12 06:48, C. Bergström wrote: I'm sincerely sorry to ask this and I have my own answers, but why continue STDCXX when such negativity from Apache is apparent.. AFAICT,

stdcxx, Solaris, KDE

2011-02-03 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
Hi, I'm one of the guys porting KDE to Solaris and we use stdcxx extensively there. I just spent some time rediscovering an old stdcxx bug, which led me to the stdcxx site in search for any news about the project. I found KDE or Solaris mentioned in http://stdcxx.apache.org/status/2010-05.text