: Liviu Nicoara
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:28 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: STDCXX-1072 SPARC V8 mutex alignment requirements
I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC machine
could give it a runall and post the results here it would
] 140 %
I also tested with POSIX mutexes and saw the same behavior.
Travis
From: Liviu Nicoara
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:28 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: STDCXX-1072 SPARC V8 mutex alignment requirements
I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access
I applied the patch on 4.2.x. If someone with access to a SPARC machine
could give it a runall and post the results here it would be awesome. I
will postpone closing the incident until then.
Thanks!
Liviu
On 10/06/12 16:56, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 09/29/12 15:33, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On
On 9/28/12 11:32 AM, Travis Vitek wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Nicoara
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 5:29 AM
[...]
The patch assumes the type `long double' exists on every platform. While I do
believe that it is available everywhere, we have lots of conditional code
