GitHub user xiaokang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315
STORM-558 change swap! to reset! to fix assignment-versions always
empty in supervisor
This PR is for JIRA STORM-558 to fix #167 .
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214413#comment-14214413
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-558:
--
GitHub user xiaokang opened a pull request:
Github user xiaokang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/167#issuecomment-63273071
Thanks @nathanmarz for verification. Another PR #315 is opened.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214414#comment-14214414
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-375:
--
Github user xiaokang commented on the pull
Github user xiaokang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315#issuecomment-63273340
The unit test is failed BOTH before and after this code change. I'll try to
find the problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315#issuecomment-63318696
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user harshach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315#issuecomment-63320364
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214729#comment-14214729
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-558:
--
Github user harshach commented on the pull
Even if we cannot reproduce it in all cases, the change was rather small not
totally necessary. +1 for reverting.
- Bobby
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:23 PM, Harsha st...@harsha.io wrote:
I am able to reproduce this using Sean's topology. I am +1 on reverting
this.
Thanks,
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-63332256
I was curious if we wanted to keep a 5MB file in our github repo that
everyone must download to get storm? As it stands now the git repo is about
11MB total. This could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214810#comment-14214810
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-557:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
Github user harshach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-63336734
@revans2 There is another JIRA asking for the current storm.apache.org docs
to be moved onto github.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-544.
As
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214838#comment-14214838
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-557:
--
Github user harshach commented on the pull
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-63337668
OK so the next question I have is, should we split the one big SVG file up
along side rasterized PNG equivalents for use in the docs?
---
If your project is set up for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214851#comment-14214851
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-557:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
Github user harshach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-63338507
@revans2 sounds like a good idea to provide PNG files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214898#comment-14214898
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-558:
--
Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214916#comment-14214916
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-512:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214920#comment-14214920
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-558:
--
Github user nathanmarz commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214936#comment-14214936
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-512:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
Hello All,
I am using kafka spout that comes with storm 0.9.3 (
https://github.com/apache/storm).
I am having several different bolts consuming the same tuples from the
spout (in the same topology). These bolts process the tuples and send the
output to different destinations. I have a couple of
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-63354593
OK I split them apart, cleaned up one of the SVG images to make it smaller,
and added in some PNG versions, along with updating the security document to
use one of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214986#comment-14214986
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-512:
--
Github user nielsbasjes commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14215010#comment-14215010
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-512:
--
Github user nielsbasjes commented on the pull
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/313#issuecomment-63367628
Thanks @Parth-Brahmbhatt. I merged this into the master and 0.9.3 branches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315#issuecomment-63373190
Thanks @xiaokang. I merged this into the master and 0.9.3 branches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
P. Taylor Goetz resolved STORM-558.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.9.3
supervisor's assignment-versions memory cache
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/315
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Okay, I’ve reverted the commit in the 0.9.3 branch. I did not revert it in
master.
For master we can either choose to revert it there as well, or leave it and
continue to look for a root cause. I’m open to either and would like to hear
what other people think.
In addition to the revert of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14215163#comment-14215163
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-558:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Thanks for the input Bobby and Nathan. I’ll revert it there as well unless
anyone proposes a compelling reason not to.
What are your thoughts on moving forward with the 0.9.3 release?
-Taylor
On Nov 17, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Nathan Marz nat...@nathanmarz.com wrote:
I agree, it should be reverted
)
--
Key: STORM-350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
Reporter: Boris Aksenov
Fix For: 0.10.0
Attachments:
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-3-worker
)
--
Key: STORM-350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
Reporter: Boris Aksenov
Fix For: 0.10.0
Attachments:
20141117-0.9.3
Attachments:
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-3-worker-separate-1-spout-and-2-bolts-failing-tuples.png,
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-one-worker-failing-tuples.png,
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-three-workers-1-spout-3-bolts-failing-tuples.png,
20141118-0.9.3-branch-3-worker-separate-1-spout-and-2-bolts-ok.png,
20141118
)
--
Key: STORM-350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
Reporter: Boris Aksenov
Fix For: 0.9.3
Attachments:
20141117
Attachments:
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-3-worker-separate-1-spout-and-2-bolts-failing-tuples.png,
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-one-worker-failing-tuples.png,
20141117-0.9.3-rc1-three-workers-1-spout-3-bolts-failing-tuples.png,
20141118-0.9.3-branch-3-worker-separate-1-spout-and-2-bolts-ok.png,
20141118-0.9.3
Github user tedxia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/268#issuecomment-63424599
@ptgoetz I have merge storm/master to this patch and all tests pass except
storm-core/test/clj/backtype/storm/multilang_test.clj, test results are(after
I removed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14215731#comment-14215731
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user tedxia commented on the pull
Github user tedxia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/268#issuecomment-63430061
```
I tested this by applying it to the 0.9.3 branch and found problems with
the unit tests (never-ending cycle of zookeeper reconnects, tests never
complete).
```
Github user clockfly commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/120#issuecomment-63431309
The original behavior of findAndReadConfigFile() is to locate config file
on classpath.
findResources(name) will not be empty when name exists on classpath.
40 matches
Mail list logo