[GitHub] storm issue #2303: STORM-2660 The Nimbus storm-local directory is relative t...

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2303 @srdo Also addressed review comments and squashed commits into one. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm issue #2306: [STORM-2717] Output topology Id from storm list command

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2306 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] storm issue #2306: [STORM-2717] Output topology Id from storm list command

Github user Ethanlm commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2306 Something like this:  --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] storm pull request #2306: [STORM-2717] Output topology Id from storm list co...

GitHub user Ethanlm opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2306 [STORM-2717] Output topology Id from storm list command I think we should output topology id from the storm list command for debugging purpose. JIRA:

Re: Some thoughts on "no timeframe"

I agree that we should try to keep the number of issues without a pending PR assigned to each person down. Given that different people have different amounts of time to dedicate to the project, it seems fine to me that someone is assigned an issue even if they are working on it off and on. If an

[GitHub] storm issue #2303: STORM-2660 The Nimbus storm-local directory is relative t...

Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2303 +1, verified that `storm nimbus` now puts storm-local in the right directory. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm issue #2289: STORM-2702: storm-loadgen

Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2289 @roshannaik I think I have added in all of your feature requests so far. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm pull request #2303: STORM-2660 The Nimbus storm-local directory is rel...

Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2303#discussion_r136595401 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/utils/ConfigUtils.java --- @@ -215,6 +215,20 @@ public static String absoluteStormLocalDir(Map

[GitHub] storm pull request #1782: Feature/storm 1369 (#2)

Github user mkoch1 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1782 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] storm pull request #2301: Quick fix: remove storm-rename-hack dependency

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2301 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] storm issue #2301: Quick fix: remove storm-rename-hack dependency

Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2301 +1 sorry I missed it when I did the other hanges --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] storm pull request #2305: STORM-2533 Visualization API returns "spout" for s...

GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2305 STORM-2533 Visualization API returns "spout" for system components * also fixed STORM-2534 Visualization API missing stats/instances for "system" components * one thing which should be