[GitHub] storm issue #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647 @revans2 Thx for your work, the storm-core travis check still fails, we should fix that. ---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2667: STORM-3063: Fix minor pom issues

2018-05-08 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2667#discussion_r186888587 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -1275,6 +1270,25 @@ true + +

[GitHub] storm issue #2667: STORM-3063: Fix minor pom issues

2018-05-08 Thread hmcl
Github user hmcl commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2667 +1 ---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2667: STORM-3063: Fix minor pom issues

2018-05-08 Thread hmcl
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2667#discussion_r186887493 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -1275,6 +1270,25 @@ true + +

[GitHub] storm pull request #2667: STORM-3063: Fix minor pom issues

2018-05-08 Thread srdo
GitHub user srdo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2667 STORM-3063: Fix minor pom issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3063 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/srdo/storm

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 @ptgoetz @dbist I'm OK to go ahead assuming it is normal to run JmxReporter without additional options. But please sort out options as I commented earlier. It makes no sense to mix up

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread arunmahadevan
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 I think if we can shade all the storm-druid dependencies we could probably leave it there. At-least a few of the other storm connectors have not been updated in a while but we still keep

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 Got a response https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/22fa072edfdcb5a2fdb06e8c99daf8b2635da78e87c28e72b332ac0e@%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E. Sounds like Kafka is the recommended way to ingest into Druid,

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread dbist
Github user dbist commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 doc update jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3062 please review this PR and 2666 for branch 2 fix. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread dbist
Github user dbist commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 @ptgoetz you've read my mind, this fix is holding up a release and I can work on the separate jira to address the doc, not a problem. We can target that for next release. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread arunmahadevan
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 Lets wait for a response. I think we can add some notes saying that storm-druid is deprecated and shade its dependencies than completely removing it since there are some users using it. This

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 I sent them an email here https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4114eb25ff1e570927aa283c4127f8c83fb3bbee631ddebeee729f4c@%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E. I think if it turns out that Tranquility is

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread arunmahadevan
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 @revans2 thanks for understanding the concerns and agree that we should do something about the long term support for tranquility. We can probably poke them like @srdo suggested to get out a

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 @HeartSaVioR Agreed, but those issues can be addressed outside the scope of this bug (i.e. separate JIRA). For now we should focus on getting this fix in since it is currently holding up the

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread arunmahadevan
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 We should add docs and an example usage in the storm.yaml.example (which has graphite and console). @dbist will be great if you address this for JMXStormReporter as a part of this PR. ---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2637: STORM-3060: Map of Spout configurations from storm...

2018-05-08 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2637 ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2637: STORM-3060: Map of Spout configurations from storm-kafka ...

2018-05-08 Thread hmcl
Github user hmcl commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2637 +1 @srishtyagrawal thank you for your nice and helpful contribution. It will benefit a lot of users. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 @arunmahadevan and @srdo https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2882 is for adding back in shading to the storm client. I am happy to take that up next. My real concern is the long

[GitHub] storm pull request #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2664: STORM-2884: Remove storm-druid

2018-05-08 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2664 I think shading Curator in storm-druid seems like the best option, and maybe poking a bit at the Druid guys to get a release of Tranquility out. If it turns out that they are dropping Tranquility

[GitHub] storm issue #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647 @danny0405 I added in the comments about thread safety like you suggested. ---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647#discussion_r186756808 --- Diff: storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/Cluster.java --- @@ -763,6 +773,7 @@ public void setAssignments(

[GitHub] storm pull request #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647#discussion_r186754134 --- Diff: storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/Cluster.java --- @@ -48,6 +49,9 @@ public class Cluster implements

[GitHub] storm pull request #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647#discussion_r186665919 --- Diff: storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/Cluster.java --- @@ -763,6 +773,7 @@ public void setAssignments(

[GitHub] storm pull request #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647#discussion_r186665266 --- Diff: storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/Cluster.java --- @@ -48,6 +49,9 @@ public class Cluster implements

[GitHub] storm issue #2647: STORM-3040: Improve scheduler performance

2018-05-08 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2647 @revans2 I approve with you promotion totally. The only concern are all kinds of cache we use here, now storm has many caches not just for scheduling. I just think if we can make a

[GitHub] storm issue #2665: STORM-2988 Error on initialization of server mk-worker

2018-05-08 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2665 @arunmahadevan @ptgoetz Let's "reuse all" or "duplicate all", not reuse some of them partially. And let's leave explanation on JmxStormReporter, since there's no explanation on