Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user itaifrenkel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291#issuecomment-59323312
ok. please just note that there are 3 files to change and I only changed 2
of them. I cannot tell why was the third file diverted from the others. It
looks like a
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291#issuecomment-59346967
Looks good to me. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291#issuecomment-59222813
@itaifrenkel Sorry for the long silence. We have been battling a fire
here with all hands on deck. I don't see much of a reason for this to wait on
STORM-528. You made
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291#issuecomment-59226497
I am +1 for this change. The code looks to do as expected, and everything
runs well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user itaifrenkel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/291
[STORM-529] Send fail(tup) when BasicBolt process throws Exception
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/forter/storm
