[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-567: Move Storm Documentation/Website fr...

2014-12-05 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/330#issuecomment-65801181 @ptgoetz any update on this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-567: Move Storm Documentation/Website fr...

2014-11-27 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/330#issuecomment-64840972 Looks great to me! I'm interested on documentation, but not having front-end skill. Just 2 cents, actually content is most important part of documentation, and

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-567: Move Storm Documentation/Website fr...

2014-11-26 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/330#issuecomment-64701658 I should also mention the site is statically generated using [jekyll](http://jekyllrb.com). First install jekyll (assuming you have ruby installed): ```

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-567: Move Storm Documentation/Website fr...

2014-11-26 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/330#issuecomment-64707784 For the most part it looks great. It looks like we could use some license headers in some of the files. My only other comment would be to add in a