GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/324
[STORM-569] Add Configuration to enable/disable Bolt's outgoing
overflow-buffer
- Added topology level flag
`topology.bolts.outgoing.overflow.buffer.enable` - which defaults to `true
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/410
[STORM-400] Thrift upgrade to thrift-0.9.2
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kishorvpatil/incubator-storm thrift092
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/410#issuecomment-73174063
@ptgoetz, Thanks for reviewing this. I have up merged the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/410#issuecomment-74700449
@darionyaphet, Thrift 0.9.2 includes python hash function.
[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2621]. Without this change, we
were using @nathanmarz 's
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/258#issuecomment-72265757
@BuDongDong, can you please create JIRA to elaborate on the change, and
need to delete missing-tasks? Also it would be good to get PR subject
describe changes
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/413#issuecomment-73544830
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468
[STORM-712] Storm daemons shutdown if OutOfMemoryError occurs in any thread
- Creating `ExtendedThreadPoolExecutor` to pass uncaughtExceptions as part
of `afterExecute`
- All daemon main
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/328#issuecomment-83749375
@revans2 Thank you. I have merged in the changes. Sorry for delay.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/437#issuecomment-76751433
Looks good. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/296#issuecomment-76745378
@caofangkun, could you please upmerge this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/314#issuecomment-76749927
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/321#issuecomment-75573879
@harshach would you like to provide update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#discussion_r27318086
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/utils/Utils.java ---
@@ -533,4 +533,16 @@ private static SerializationDelegate
getSerializationDelegate(Map
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#discussion_r27317843
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/drpc/DRPCSpout.java ---
@@ -129,7 +133,9 @@ private void checkFutures() {
public void open(Map conf
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#issuecomment-86350235
@lazyval, sorry for delay in responding. We have seen this happen in case
some of our clusters. When the `ExecutorService`, executes the `FutureTask`, it
captures
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/537#issuecomment-97092233
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#issuecomment-91057918
@lazyval Thanks for pointing out. I have updated the PR to rethrow non OOM
Errors. Also, main server thread should exit on Error.
---
If your project is set up
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/507#issuecomment-90160883
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/577#issuecomment-109056014
Thank you @ptgoetz. The changes worked. And Jetty is shaded now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/577#issuecomment-109043828
I tried What @Parth-Brahmbhatt suggested to successfully build it. Testing
it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/577#issuecomment-108989857
@Parth-Brahmbhatt Primarily, anything that's getting directly called from
withing clojure is hard to shade. Hence (disruptor, jetty..) etc are not
shaded
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581#issuecomment-110025014
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/577
[STORM-848] Shade external dependencies
Shading following dependencies:
org.apache.httpcomponents:http*
org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper
org.apache.curator:*
com.twitter:carbonite
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/577#issuecomment-109023252
@ptgoetz I get following exceptions when I try to shade Jetty
```Console
Compiling storm.starter.clj.word-count to
/home/kpatil/commun/incubator-storm
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/457#issuecomment-110489805
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/457#issuecomment-115756416
@ppoulosk Thank you for the patch. This is merged into the master now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/591#issuecomment-112089001
Thank you @HeartSaVioR. I have merged the change in. This should help us
get better feedback on the pull request from CI build.
---
If your project is set up
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/590#issuecomment-112094414
Thank you @HeartSaVioR . This change is merged to master now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/597
[STORM-874] Add UncaughtExceptionHandler for netty threads
The netty threads need to handle uncaught exceptions. This would help
ensure that JVM exits if netty threads hit OOM Error while
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/576#issuecomment-111516456
Thank you @snikhil5. This is pulled into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/592#issuecomment-111503147
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/591#issuecomment-111580559
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/590#issuecomment-111583986
+1. Good catch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/559#issuecomment-106066678
@ptgoetz Thank you for the feedback. I will rename the config o
`UI_PROJECT_BUGTRACKER_URL`. Find licensed images and add documentation to the
this PR
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/562
[STORM-833] Logging framework logback - log4j 2.x
As part of changes to logging framework:
- Migrate from logback to log4j2
- Use RFC5424 foramt for routing logs to rsyslog
- Get
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/816#issuecomment-150853651
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/813#discussion_r42795412
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/cluster.clj ---
@@ -89,68 +107,69 @@
(set-ephemeral-node
[this path data acls
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/813
[STORM-1125] Adding separate ZK client for read in Nimbus ZK State
Separate reader and writer for nimbus to avoid longer waits for reads to
finish.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810
[STORM-1121] Remove method call to avoid overhead during topology
submission time
Nimbus calls mk-assignments from SubmitTopology within lock is causing it
to wait for processing of all
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828#discussion_r43389985
--- Diff: docs/documentation/Message-passing-implementation.md ---
@@ -8,23 +8,23 @@ documentation: true
This page walks through how emitting
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828#discussion_r43390007
--- Diff: docs/documentation/Message-passing-implementation.md ---
@@ -8,23 +8,23 @@ documentation: true
This page walks through how emitting
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828#discussion_r43390022
--- Diff: docs/documentation/Message-passing-implementation.md ---
@@ -8,23 +8,23 @@ documentation: true
This page walks through how emitting
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/797#issuecomment-151863878
Thanks @HeartSaVioR @harshach. I will pull this in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/829#issuecomment-152308917
LGTM. The 1.8 travis build failure seems unrelated.
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/765#issuecomment-151942417
@d2r @knusbaum @mjsax @harshach @HeartSaVioR @ptgoetz
Now that #797 is in. We should consider pulling in batching solution. Can
you please review this PR
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150667453
@HeartSaVioR Thank you for review and suggestions. I have made changes so
that our tests are using simulated-time cluster to avoid `Thread/sleep`. Please
revisit
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/797#issuecomment-150673459
LGTM. +1.
@HeartSaVioR would you like to revisit and see Bobby's changes have
addressed you comment. We have been running this in our staging for some time
now
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/813#issuecomment-150674032
@HeartSaVioR I have updated the the code to use flag instead of is-nimbus?
method. Thank you for suggesting this loose-coupling. Please revisit the
changes
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/797#issuecomment-150698673
@HeartSaVioR We are not seeing any tuple loss, so there as way can we
reproduce it? Some details on what topology, cluster setup and/or h/w to help
us reproduce
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150703213
@HeartSaVioR I don't think we can remove `NIMBUS-REASSIGN` as it used
mostly during supervisor_test to avoid rescheduling with value `false`. The
documentation
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/815
[Storm-1121] Deprecate test only configuraton nimbus.reassign
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kishorvpatil/incubator-storm
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150729673
@HeartSaVioR
- Modified to make "nimbus.reassign" unavailable for users.
- Created #815 to decommission variable for 0.10.x branch.
-
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150702270
@HeartSaVioR Removed rebalance calls at places where I could use simulated
time cluster.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150699962
@HeartSaVioR I tried that for supervisor_test.clj, somehow mocking of
submit topologies etc.methods don't make it easy. It seems straight forward to
rebalance
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150711148
@HeartSaVioR I complete agree with decommissioning this configuration used
only for testing. It should be unavailable for users. Let me deprecate this
variable
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150049582
@HeartSaVioR looking into compilation issue. Somehow it did not get
committed. Re-running the build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/873#issuecomment-155829362
+1. This would simplify a lot of pull requests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/869#issuecomment-155146265
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/781#issuecomment-155093941
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/830#issuecomment-155104855
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/868#issuecomment-155093325
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/559#issuecomment-156562230
@ptgoetz and @revans2
Added MIT license to both LICENSE files. Thanks again for reviewing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/879#issuecomment-157097910
@redsanket We are doing this only are couple of places.. no making it a
utility may not be much useful.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/881#issuecomment-157164426
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/559#issuecomment-156167438
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6090397/11124983/22c5ab24-892d-11e5-8361-fe037943b23c.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/559#issuecomment-156168075
@revans2 @ptgoetz Sorry for the delay in fixing this.
- I updated config name to `UI_PROJECT_BUGTRACKER_URL`.
- The new images are from public domain
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/870#issuecomment-156196285
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/888
[STORM-1215] Use Asynchronous logger for improving performance.
The changes to loggers for all daemons and workers.
- Turn off immediateFlush.
- Enable async logging.
- Turn off
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842#issuecomment-153258132
Currently, this feature lacks support for windows and command-line
interface.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842
[STORM-1157] Adding dynamic profiling for worker, restarting worker,
jstack, heap dump, and profiling
- Request restarting worker.
- Request jstack,
- Request heap dump,
- Start
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842#issuecomment-153258716
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6090397/10902398/ec51a46a-81c2-11e5-92f5-d4c79d0b80df.png;>
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6090397/10902
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/859#issuecomment-153882993
LGTM. +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43813101
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1103,21 +1216,39 @@
(.set_reset_log_level_timeout_epoch log-config (coerce
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43813189
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1179,13 +1312,15 @@
(fn
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43815176
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/daemon/supervisor.clj ---
@@ -440,10 +442,78 @@
(shutdown-worker supervisor id
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821581
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/LocalFsBlobStore.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821476
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/FileBlobStoreImpl.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821497
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/HdfsBlobStore.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821520
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/HdfsClientBlobStore.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+package backtype.storm.blobstore
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821482
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/HdfsBlobStore.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821236
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/ConfigValidation.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+/**
--- End diff --
This file should
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821508
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/HdfsBlobStoreImpl.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821679
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/LocalFsBlobStore.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821665
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/LocalFsBlobStore.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43818090
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -954,6 +954,128 @@
public static final String SUPERVISOR_SLOTS_PORTS
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821851
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/LocalFsBlobStore.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821366
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/BlobStoreAclHandler.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821343
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/BlobStore.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821323
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/BlobStore.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43821424
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/blobstore/ClientBlobStore.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/850#issuecomment-153950932
On nimbus, we need two additional counters for following Nimbus thrift ops
`setWorkerProfiler` and `getComponentPendingProfileActions`
---
If your project
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842#issuecomment-153492437
@zhuoliu I moved docs under documentation location. Also, added pointers
from main page.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842#issuecomment-153793312
@revans2 Fixed REST API documentation for consistency. Moved it to right
location and added necessary link for Documentation.md
---
If your project is set up
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43817942
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -954,6 +954,128 @@
public static final String SUPERVISOR_SLOTS_PORTS
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#discussion_r43817867
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -954,6 +954,128 @@
public static final String SUPERVISOR_SLOTS_PORTS
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/842#issuecomment-153595069
@zhuoliu I have updated the REST API documentation for all new endpoints.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/857#issuecomment-153824669
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/858#issuecomment-153824526
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/847#issuecomment-154466432
LGTM. +1. This is helpful in managing load across multiple instances of
component.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/850#issuecomment-154468111
LGTM. +1. Good bunch..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
